Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VB.2024.00612 • VG ZH VB.2024.00612 Generato dall'IA

Challenge to Contract Award Criteria Application Upheld

Numero d'incarto VB.2024.00612
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party challenged the award of a contract, alleging that the criteria for evaluating the references submitted by the winning bidder were improperly applied or that the criteria themselves were later changed. The court reasoned that the awarding authority has significant discretion in applying and evaluating suitability criteria, and that references to comparable projects are a suitable means to verify an applicant's suitability. Since the references submitted by the awarded party were deemed comparable to the scope of work specified in the tender, thus satisfying the suitability criteria, and as there was no demonstrable subsequent alteration of those criteria, the court dismissed the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Submission | Erfüllung der Eignungskriterien; Vergleichbarkeit der Referenzen. Anwendbares Recht (E. 1). Bei der Anwendung und Bewertung der Eignungskriterien kommt der Vergabebehörde grosses Ermessen zu. Referenzen zu vergleichbaren Projekten sind ein taugliches Mittel, um die Eignung eines Anbieters oder einer Anbieterin zu überprüfen (E. 2.2). Die von der Zuschlagsempfängerin eingereichten Referenzobjekte sind mit der ausgeschriebenen Leistung vergleichbar und damit geeignet, die Eignungskriterien zu erfüllen. Eine nachträgliche Änderung der Eignungskriterien ist nicht erfolgt (E. 2.4). Abweisung.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
criteri di aggiudicazione parte contraente aggiudicazione di appalto comunale esecuzione del lodo arbitrale procedimento antisovvenzioni gara d'appalto infruttuosa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 27 Abs. I IVöB
I BeiG IVöB Art. 27 Abs. I IVöB Art.
Art. 27 Abs. II IVöB
I IVöB Art. 27 Abs. II IVöB Art.
Art. 52 Abs. I IVöB
II IVöB Art. 52 Abs. I IVöB Art.
Art. 53 Abs. I lit. E IVöB
This provision likely pertains to the criteria for awarding the contract, as the appeal against the award decision was dismissed based on the evaluation of the references.
Art. 56 Abs. IV IVöB
This provision was applied in the final order concerning the dismissal of the appeal.
Art. 64 Abs. I IVöB
This provision governs the court costs, which were imposed in the final order.
§ 50 Abs. II VRG
This provision governs the court costs for the cantonal administrative proceedings, which were imposed in the final order.
Generato dall'IA
VB.2020.00807
Contract Award Discretion Upheld in Bid Challenge
VB.2015.00702
Contract Award Upheld Despite Procedural Challenge
VB.2001.00103
Contract Award Challenge: Waiver of Appeal and Evaluation Criteria
VB.2019.00033
Contract Award Upheld Despite Challenges to Weighting and Bid Information
VB.2003.00236
Bid Challenge Dismissed Over Contract Award Criteria

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 53 Abs. I lit. E IVöB

This provision likely pertains to the criteria for awarding the contract, as the appeal against the award decision was dismissed based on the evaluation of the references.

Art. 56 Abs. IV IVöB

This provision was applied in the final order concerning the dismissal of the appeal.

Art. 64 Abs. I IVöB

This provision governs the court costs, which were imposed in the final order.

§ 50 Abs. II VRG

This provision governs the court costs for the cantonal administrative proceedings, which were imposed in the final order.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2024.00612

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=224508&W10_KEY=13317470&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2024.00612 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 21.11.2024 · Spruchkörper: · 1. Abteilung/1. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Submissionsrecht · Betreff: · Submission · Erfüllung der Eignungskriterien; Vergleichbarkeit der Referenzen. Anwendbares Recht (E. 1). Bei der Anwendung und Bewertung der Eignungskriterien kommt der Vergabebehörde grosses Ermessen zu. Referenzen zu vergleichbaren Projekten sind ein taugliches Mittel, um die Eignung eines Anbieters oder einer Anbieterin zu überprüfen (E. 2.2).

Die von der Zuschlagsempfängerin eingereichten Referenzobjekte sind mit der ausgeschriebenen Leistung vergleichbar und damit geeignet, die Eignungskriterien zu erfüllen. Eine nachträgliche Änderung der Eignungskriterien ist nicht erfolgt (E. 2.4). Abweisung. · --- · Stichworte: · AUSSCHLUSS AUS DEM VERFAHREN AUSSCHLUSS EINES ANBIETERS EIGNUNGSKRITERIUM LEGITIMATION REFERENZEN · Rechtsnormen: · Art./§ 3 Abs. I BeiG IVöB Art. 27 Abs. I IVöB Art. 27 Abs. II IVöB Art. 52 Abs. I IVöB Art. 53 Abs. I lit. E IVöB Art. 56 Abs. IV IVöB Art. 64 Abs. I IVöB § 50 Abs. II VRG · Publikationen:

· - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4