Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VB.2024.00259 • VG ZH VB.2024.00259 Generato dall'IA

Conditional Release Mootness and Grant of Legal Aid on Appeal

Numero d'incarto VB.2024.00259
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The administrative court dismissed the main appeal concerning conditional release as moot because the release had already occurred, but maintained the appellant's standing regarding the request for legal aid in the appeal proceedings. Based on newly substantiated indigence, the court granted the appellant free legal aid for the appeal, ordering the case returned to the lower court for the compensation of the appointed counsel, and further granted free legal aid for the appeal proceedings themselves, accepting the appeal in the aspects not rendered moot.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

bedingte Entlassung nach Art. 86 StGB | [Gegenstandslosigkeit; unentgeltliche Prozessführung und Rechtsverbeiständung; Mittellosigkeit] In der Hauptsache als gegenstandslos abzuschreiben, da die bedingte Haftentlassung zwischenzeitlich erfolgt ist. Legitimation ist nach wie vor gegeben betreffend die unentgeltliche Rechtspflege im Rekursverfahren (E. 1). Aufgrund der nachsubstanziierten Mittellosigkeit ist diese für das Rekursverfahren anzunehmen. Damit ist die unentgeltliche Rechtspflege für das Rekursverfahren zuzusprechen und die Sache zur Entschädigung des unentgeltlichen Rechtsbeistands an die Vorinstanz zurückzuweisen (E. 2 f.). Kostenfolgen; Gewährung unentgeltliche Rechtspflege für das Beschwerdeverfahren (E. 4). Gutheissung, soweit nicht gegenstandslos; Rückweisung betreffend unentgeltliche Rechtsverbeiständung im Rekursverfahren.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
liberazione condizionale gratuito patrocinio atto processuale legittimazione a ricorrere patrocinio gratuito aspetti giuridici

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 86 StGB
Although mentioned in the title, this substantive penal code article concerning conditional release is the background subject of the case, but its specific citation in the dispositive (for ordering/annulling the release itself) is not confirmed by the summary, thus it is listed last as it relates to the subject matter rather than the final procedural orders.
Art. 110 BGG
This provision is cited in the list of legal norms, implying its use in the decision, likely concerning the appeal procedure or related matters, although the exact role in the dispositive is not perfectly clear without the full text, it is listed among the cited norms.
§ 3 AnwGebV
This regulation concerning attorney's fees is listed, suggesting it was applied regarding the remuneration of the appointed legal counsel.
§ 7 Abs. II lit. a VRG
This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.
§ 13 Abs. II VRG
This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.
§ 16 Abs. I VRG
This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.
§ 16 Abs. II VRG
This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.
§ 16 Abs. IV VRG
This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.
Generato dall'IA
VB.2019.00727
Moot Appeal on Conditional Release and Denial of Legal Aid Costs Allocation
VB.2013.00518
Appeal Regarding Denial of Conditional Release and Award of Legal Aid
PP220044
Appeal Dismissed as Moot Following Grant of Legal Aid Application
VB.2017.00178
Appeal Regarding Conditional Release and Right to be Heard

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 110 BGG

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms, implying its use in the decision, likely concerning the appeal procedure or related matters, although the exact role in the dispositive is not perfectly clear without the full text, it is listed among the cited norms.

§ 3 AnwGebV

This regulation concerning attorney's fees is listed, suggesting it was applied regarding the remuneration of the appointed legal counsel.

§ 7 Abs. II lit. a VRG

This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.

§ 13 Abs. II VRG

This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.

§ 16 Abs. I VRG

This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.

§ 16 Abs. II VRG

This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.

§ 16 Abs. IV VRG

This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.

§ 17 Abs. II VRG

This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.

§ 20a Abs. II VRG

This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.

§ 21 Abs. I VRG

This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.

§ 38b Abs. I lit. d VRG

This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.

§ 38b Abs. II VRG

This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.

§ 49 VRG

This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.

§ 52 Abs. I VRG

This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.

§ 65a Abs. II VRG

This provision of the Cantonal Administrative Procedure Act is cited, suggesting its application in the procedural ruling.

§ 9 Abs. I GebV VGr

This fee regulation provision is cited, suggesting its application in the financial orders.

Art. 86 StGB

Although mentioned in the title, this substantive penal code article concerning conditional release is the background subject of the case, but its specific citation in the dispositive (for ordering/annulling the release itself) is not confirmed by the summary, thus it is listed last as it relates to the subject matter rather than the final procedural orders.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2024.00259

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=224685&W10_KEY=13317006&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2024.00259 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 04.02.2025 · Spruchkörper: · 3. Abteilung/Einzelrichter · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Straf- und Massnahmenvollzug · Betreff: · bedingte Entlassung nach Art. 86 StGB · [Gegenstandslosigkeit; unentgeltliche Prozessführung und Rechtsverbeiständung; Mittellosigkeit] In der Hauptsache als gegenstandslos abzuschreiben, da die bedingte Haftentlassung zwischenzeitlich erfolgt ist. Legitimation ist nach wie vor gegeben betreffend die unentgeltliche Rechtspflege im Rekursverfahren (E. 1).

Aufgrund der nachsubstanziierten Mittellosigkeit ist diese für das Rekursverfahren anzunehmen. Damit ist die unentgeltliche Rechtspflege für das Rekursverfahren zuzusprechen und die Sache zur Entschädigung des unentgeltlichen Rechtsbeistands an die Vorinstanz zurückzuweisen (E. 2 f.). Kostenfolgen; Gewährung unentgeltliche Rechtspflege für das Beschwerdeverfahren (E. 4). Gutheissung, soweit nicht gegenstandslos; Rückweisung betreffend unentgeltliche Rechtsverbeiständung im Rekursverfahren. · --- · Stichworte: · ANORDNUNG IM STRAF- UND MASSNAHMENVOLLZUG BEDINGTE ENTLASSUNG GEGENSTANDSLOSIGKEIT LEGITIMATION MITTELLOSIGKEIT MITWIRKUNGSPFLICHT MITWIRKUNGSPFLICHTVERLETZUNG RÜCKWEISUNG STRAF- UND MASSNAHMENVOLLZUG UNENTGELTLICHE PROZESSFÜHRUNG (UP) UNENTGELTLICHE RECHTSPFLEGE (UP/URB) UNENTGELTLICHER RECHTSBEISTAND (URB) · Rechtsnormen:

· § 3 AnwGebV Art. 110 BGG § 9 Abs. I GebV VGr § 7 Abs. II lit. a VRG § 13 Abs. II VRG § 16 Abs. I VRG § 16 Abs. II VRG § 16 Abs. IV VRG § 17 Abs. II VRG § 20a Abs. II VRG § 21 Abs. I VRG § 38b Abs. I lit. d VRG § 38b Abs. II VRG § 49 VRG § 52 Abs. I VRG § 65a Abs. II VRG · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4