Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
21 06 128 • KG LU 21 06 128 Généré par l'IA

Attempted Marketing of High-THC Hemp Feed Cubes for Livestock

Numéro de cause 21 06 128
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Partiellement admis (Partially Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The defendant was prosecuted for the attempted marketing of hemp processed into feed cubes, which was prohibited for use with livestock because the THC content exceeded legal limits, despite the defendant claiming the product was intended for non-livestock animals. The court reasoned that the defendant acted with intent or at least accepted the risk that the feed would be used for livestock, as evidenced by the distribution contract and general industry understanding, thus fulfilling the subjective element of the offense under the relevant agricultural law provisions for placing unapproved agricultural production means on the market; consequently, the conviction for attempted marketing was upheld, the previous acquittal was overturned, and the seized feed cubes were ordered to be destroyed due to the public order risk associated with their potential unauthorized distribution, while a fine of CHF 400 was deemed appropriate given the circumstances.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 21 StGB, Art. 173 LwG, Art. 173 Abs. 1 lit. l LwG, Art. 173 Abs. 1 lit. k LwG, Art. 58 StGB, Art. 160 Abs. 1 LwG; Attempted Marketing of High-THC Hemp Feed Cubes for Livestock: The court reasoned that the defendant acted with intent or at least accepted the risk that the feed would be used for livestock, as evidenced by the distribution contract and general industry understanding, thus fulfilling the subjective element of the offense under the relevant agricultural law provisions for placing unapproved agricultural production means on the market; consequently, the conviction for attempted marketing was upheld, the previous acquittal was overturned, and the seized feed cubes were ordered to be destroyed due to the public order risk associated with their potential unauthorized distribution, while a fine of CHF 400 was deemed appropriate given the circumstances.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
utilisation agricole culture de cannabis moyens d'exploitation marché à prendre en considération infractions relatives au chanvre aliments pour animaux – Produits et hygiène

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 21 StGB
Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht Entscheiddatum: · 28.11.2006 Fallnummer: · 21 06 128 LGVE: Leitsatz: · Art. 21 StGB, Art.
Art. 173 LwG
Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · II. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht Entscheiddatum: · 28.11.2006 Fallnummer: · 21 06 128 LGVE: Leitsatz: · Art. 21 StGB, Art. 173 LwG. Versuchtes Inverkehrbringen von Hanf als Futter für Nutztiere. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.
Art. 173 Abs. 1 lit. l LwG
Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · II. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht Entscheiddatum: · 28.11.2006 Fallnummer: · 21 06 128 LGVE: Leitsatz: · Art. 21 StGB, Art. 173 LwG. Versuchtes Inverkehrbringen von Hanf als Futter für Nutztiere. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.
Art. 173 Abs. 1 lit. k LwG
Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · II. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht Entscheiddatum: · 28.11.2006 Fallnummer: · 21 06 128 LGVE: Leitsatz: · Art. 21 StGB, Art. 173 LwG. Versuchtes Inverkehrbringen von Hanf als Futter für Nutztiere. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.
Art. 58 StGB
Applied to order the confiscation and destruction of the seized hemp feed cubes.
Art. 160 Abs. 1 LwG
Art. 158 Abs. 1 LwG
Art. 18 FMBV

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BGE 119 IV 1
BGE 116 IV 289
BGE 127 IV 207
Généré par l'IA
KA 00 139
Hemp Sales Forfeiture Upheld Due to High THC Content
21 01 26
Narcotics Act Violation and THC Thresholds for Hemp Products
21 10 4
Manure Spreading in Protected Moor Area: Activity Offense vs. Result-Based Harm
V 98 132
Operator's Appeal and Suspension of Unlawful Activity Cessation Order
11 07 121
Landlord's Eviction Based on Improper Termination Notice for Commercial Sheep Stable Tenancy

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 173 Abs. 1 lit. k LwG i.V.m. Art. 21 Abs. 1 StGB

This provision is the main ground for finding the accused guilty of attempted illicit marketing of agricultural production means.

Art. 58 StGB

Applied to order the confiscation and destruction of the seized hemp feed cubes.

Art. 21 Abs. 1 StGB

Cited alongside Art. 173 Abs. 1 lit. k LwG as the basis for the finding of attempt.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · II. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht Entscheiddatum: · 28.11.2006 Fallnummer: · 21 06 128 LGVE: Leitsatz: · Art. 21 StGB, Art. 173 LwG. Versuchtes Inverkehrbringen von Hanf als Futter für Nutztiere. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.