Court ruled that maintaining readiness to work on a relative's farm defines stable employment for social insurance purposes.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a decision excluding a farmer's brother from social insurance. The court held that stable work on a farm is defined by the insured's readiness to perform necessary tasks for a close relative, even if they engage in non-farming business. The court rejected the argument that the brother's primary income came from his business, emphasizing that the statutory requirement focuses on the willingness to support the farm's functioning rather than full-time employment.