II UKN 299/98
KI-generiert
School commute periods during agricultural work do not count as employment for pension purposes under Polish law.
Polen (PL)
Legislator-Zusammenfassung
KI-generiertThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that excluded specific agricultural work periods from the insured's pension contribution history. The insured argued that his time working on his parents' farm during school holidays should count, but the court found his daily 160 km commute to a technical school prevented him from performing substantial agricultural duties. Consequently, the court held these periods did not meet the legal definition of agricultural employment required for pension accrual.
Legislator-Regeste
KI-generiertArt. 5 pkt 3 ustawy o rewaloryzacji emerytur i rent; Agricultural work performed by a student with daily long-distance commutes does not constitute employment for pension purposes.
Schlagwörter
KI-generiert
agricultural employment definition
pension contribution periods
student commuting distance
substantial work requirement
pension eligibility criteria
school attendance impact
contribution history calculation
Zitierte Gesetzesbestimmungen
KI-generiertArt. 5 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 17 października 1991 r. o rewaloryzacji emerytur i rent
art. 2 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
art. 6 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
art. 2 ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy rewaloryzacyjnej
art. 393 § 12 KPC