Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VB.2024.00603 • VG ZH VB.2024.00603 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Undetermined Special Education Measures in Child Placement

Numero d'incarto VB.2024.00603
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A prior decision ordering the placement of a child in Integrated Special Education (ISR) without specifying the concrete special educational measures was appealed because the parents retained a legitimate interest in the clarification of those measures for placement in a regular school, even though the child was temporarily enrolled in a private school. The court held that the lower instance wrongly dismissed the appeal as moot, as the responsible authority had never issued a unilateral order detailing the specific measures, meaning the appeal was directed at a non-existent subject of challenge, compelling the lower court to refer the matter back to the authority for immediate determination of the concrete measures.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Übertritt in die Integrierte Sonderschulung (ISR) | [Anordnung der Integrierten Sonderschulung in der Verantwortung der Regelklasse, ohne gleichzeitig die konkreten sonderpädagogischen Massnahmen festzulegen.] Die Abschreibung des Rekursverfahrens erfolgte zu Unrecht, da ein aktuelles schutzwürdiges Interesse der Beschwerdeführenden an der konkreten Festlegung der sonderpädagogischen Massnahmen mit Blick auf eine Beschulung ihrer Tochter in der Regelschule unverändert besteht. Die zwischenzeitliche Einschulung der Tochter in einer Privatschule bis zu einem Entscheid der Beschwerdegegnerin über die konkreten Massnahmen ändert nichts hieran. Zu den konkreten Massnahmen hat die Beschwerdegegnerin allerdings noch gar keine einseitige Anordnung getroffen, weshalb es an einem Anfechtungsobjekt fehlt und die Vorinstanz die Sache umgehend an die Beschwerdegegnerin hätte überweisen müssen (E. 3). Gutheissung

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
istruzione scolastica speciale collocamento del minore impugnazione di decisioni amministrative scuola privata circostanze particolari misura educativa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 24 VSM
Cited in connection with the special educational measures that the administrative authority had not yet ordered, leading to the case being referred back.
Art. 25 VSM
Cited in connection with the special educational measures that the administrative authority had not yet ordered, leading to the case being referred back.
Art. 26 VSM
Cited in connection with the special educational measures that the administrative authority had not yet ordered, leading to the case being referred back.
§ 37 VSG
The appeal was allowed because the lower court wrongly dismissed the case, whereas the appellant maintained a legitimate interest in the concrete determination of special educational measures.
§ 5 Abs. 2 VRG
This procedural provision was cited in relation to the necessary referral of the matter back to the administrative authority.
Generato dall'IA
VB.2023.00543
Appeal Regarding Mandatory External Special Education Placement and Cost Allocation
VB.2015.00339
Appeal Regarding Special Education Measures and Psychological Report
VB.2023.00478
Administrative Court Decision on Suspensive Effect of Appeal Against Special Education Order
VB.2008.00368
Parents v. Authority on Special Education Placement
IV.2005.00380
Appeal Regarding Denial of Special Education Contributions for Child with Congenital Defects

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 37 VSG

The appeal was allowed because the lower court wrongly dismissed the case, whereas the appellant maintained a legitimate interest in the concrete determination of special educational measures.

Art. 24 VSM

Cited in connection with the special educational measures that the administrative authority had not yet ordered, leading to the case being referred back.

Art. 25 VSM

Cited in connection with the special educational measures that the administrative authority had not yet ordered, leading to the case being referred back.

Art. 26 VSM

Cited in connection with the special educational measures that the administrative authority had not yet ordered, leading to the case being referred back.

§ 5 Abs. 2 VRG

This procedural provision was cited in relation to the necessary referral of the matter back to the administrative authority.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2024.00603

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=224676&W10_KEY=13317006&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2024.00603 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 23.01.2025 · Spruchkörper: · 4. Abteilung/4. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Bildung · Betreff: · Übertritt in die Integrierte Sonderschulung (ISR) · [Anordnung der Integrierten Sonderschulung in der Verantwortung der Regelklasse, ohne gleichzeitig die konkreten sonderpädagogischen Massnahmen festzulegen.] Die Abschreibung des Rekursverfahrens erfolgte zu Unrecht, da ein aktuelles schutzwürdiges Interesse der Beschwerdeführenden an der konkreten Festlegung der sonderpädagogischen Massnahmen mit Blick auf eine Beschulung ihrer Tochter in der Regelschule unverändert besteht.

Die zwischenzeitliche Einschulung der Tochter in einer Privatschule bis zu einem Entscheid der Beschwerdegegnerin über die konkreten Massnahmen ändert nichts hieran. Zu den konkreten Massnahmen hat die Beschwerdegegnerin allerdings noch gar keine einseitige Anordnung getroffen, weshalb es an einem Anfechtungsobjekt fehlt und die Vorinstanz die Sache umgehend an die Beschwerdegegnerin hätte überweisen müssen (E. 3). Gutheissung · --- · Stichworte: · INTEGRIERTE SONDERSCHULUNG RECHTSSCHUTZINTERESSE ÜBERWEISUNG · Rechtsnormen: · § 5 Abs. 2 VRG § 37 VSG Art. 24 VSM Art. 25 VSM Art. 26 VSM · Publikationen:

· - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 3