Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VB.2024.00046 • VG ZH VB.2024.00046 Generato dall'IA

Traffic Order Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing

Numero d'incarto VB.2024.00046
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The administrative court dismissed an appeal challenging a temporary traffic order imposing a driving ban because the appellant lacked standing, as the practical benefit of the requested signal relocation was deemed questionable given the local conditions and any intended use of an interior courtyard for travel was legally inadmissible due to planning regulations. The court concluded that the appellant's interest in the matter was neither practical nor worthy of protection, leading to a decision of non-admittance.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Verkehrsanordnung | [Versuchsweises Fahrverbot; Beschwerdelegitimation] Praktischer Nutzen der beantragten Signalverschiebung zweifelhaft aufgrund der örtlichen Gegebenheiten; praktischer Nutzen jedenfalls nicht schutzwürdig, zumal beabsichtigte Fahrtroute durch Innenhof rechtlich unzulässig (gestaltungsplanwidrig); keine Beschwerdelegitimation (E. 1). Nichteintreten.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
divieto di condurre legittimazione a ricorrere legittimazione a contestare licenza violazione semplice della LCStr tutela legale misura di allontanamento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 83 Abs. III PBG
This provision is cited in the section listing the legal norms applied, suggesting it formed the basis for the decision regarding the appeal's admissibility or substance.
§ 83 Abs. I PBG
This provision is cited in the section listing the legal norms applied, suggesting it formed the basis for the decision regarding the appeal's admissibility or substance.
§ 21 Abs. I VRG
This provision is cited in the section listing the legal norms applied, suggesting it formed the basis for the decision regarding the appeal's admissibility or substance (likely related to procedural aspects like standing/legitimation).
§ 49 VRG
This provision is cited in the section listing the legal norms applied, suggesting it formed the basis for the decision regarding the appeal's admissibility or substance.
Generato dall'IA
VB.2019.00074
Traffic Order Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing
VB.2022.00024
Traffic Order Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing
VB.2016.00645
Administrative Court Dismisses Traffic Order Appeal Due to Lack of Legal Standing
VB.2014.00079
Appeal Against Traffic Regulation Dismissed for Lack of Standing

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 83 Abs. III PBG

This provision is cited in the section listing the legal norms applied, suggesting it formed the basis for the decision regarding the appeal's admissibility or substance.

§ 83 Abs. I PBG

This provision is cited in the section listing the legal norms applied, suggesting it formed the basis for the decision regarding the appeal's admissibility or substance.

§ 21 Abs. I VRG

This provision is cited in the section listing the legal norms applied, suggesting it formed the basis for the decision regarding the appeal's admissibility or substance (likely related to procedural aspects like standing/legitimation).

§ 49 VRG

This provision is cited in the section listing the legal norms applied, suggesting it formed the basis for the decision regarding the appeal's admissibility or substance.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2024.00046

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=225086&W10_KEY=13317002&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2024.00046 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 26.06.2025 · Spruchkörper: · 3. Abteilung/3. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Eine Beschwerde in öffentlich-rechtlichen Angelegenheiten ist am Bundesgericht noch hängig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Übriges Verwaltungsrecht · Betreff: · Verkehrsanordnung · [Versuchsweises Fahrverbot; Beschwerdelegitimation] Praktischer Nutzen der beantragten Signalverschiebung zweifelhaft aufgrund der örtlichen Gegebenheiten; praktischer Nutzen jedenfalls nicht schutzwürdig, zumal beabsichtigte Fahrtroute durch Innenhof rechtlich unzulässig (gestaltungsplanwidrig); keine Beschwerdelegitimation (E. 1).

Nichteintreten. · --- · Stichworte: · BESCHWERDELEGITIMATION FAHRVERBOT GESTALTUNGSPLANVORSCHRIFTEN LEGITIMATION LEGITIMATIONSVORAUSSETZUNGEN NICHTEINTRETEN NICHTEINTRETENSENTSCHEID PRAKTISCHER NUTZEN SCHUTZWÜRDIGES INTERESSE SCHUTZWÜRDIGKEIT SIGNAL TEMPORÄR VERKEHR (INKL. STRASSENRECHT, WANDERWEGE) VERKEHRSANORDNUNG VERSCHIEBUNG · Rechtsnormen: · § 107 Abs. II bis KSigV § 83 Abs. I PBG § 83 Abs. III PBG § 21 Abs. I VRG § 49 VRG · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 3