Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VB.2023.00467 • VG ZH VB.2023.00467 Generato dall'IA

Inmate Disciplinary Restriction Upheld for Unauthorized Call

Numero d'incarto VB.2023.00467
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court upheld a disciplinary penalty of three days of telephone restriction with private individuals imposed on an individual for making an unauthorized private call during work hours while in custody. The court reasoned that the individual could not derive any benefit from claiming unfamiliarity with the weekly schedule and work hours, as the regulation violation was clear, and while the sanction was strict given the circumstances, it was not disproportionate when considering the individual's multiple prior disciplinary actions; furthermore, a fine could not be imposed because the individual's credit account showed a deficit.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Disziplinarstrafe | Disziplinarstrafe. Der Beschwerdegegner disziplinierte den Beschwerdeführer zu Recht mit drei Tagen Telefonverbot mit Privatpersonen, nachdem Letzterer unerlaubterweise während der Arbeitszeit ein Telefonat mit einer Privatperson geführt hatte. Daraus, dass der Beschwerdeführer geltend macht, neu auf der Abteilung gewesen und mit dem Wochenplan sowie den Arbeitszeiten noch nicht vertraut gewesen zu sein, kann er nichts zu seinen Gunsten ableiten (E. 3.3). Die Sanktion erweist sich unter den gegebenen Umständen zwar als streng, aber insgesamt und mit Blick auf die mehrfachen Disziplinierungen des Beschwerdeführers nicht als unverhältnismässig. Da das Freikonto des Beschwerdeführers einen Minussaldo aufwies, konnte keine Busse verhängt werden (E. 3.5). Abweisung.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
multe disciplinari lavoro su chiamata sanzione sproporzionata diritto penitenziario esercizio del diritto di visita violazione delle norme procedurali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 91 Abs. I StGB
This article appears to form the basis for the disciplinary penalty upheld, although the specific article applied in the dispositive is not directly visible, this is the core substantive provision referenced alongside others used in the case context.
Art. 91 Abs. II StGB
This article appears to form the basis for the disciplinary penalty upheld, although the specific article applied in the dispositive is not directly visible, this is the core substantive provision referenced alongside others used in the case context.
Art. 91 Abs. III StGB
This article appears to form the basis for the disciplinary penalty upheld, although the specific article applied in the dispositive is not directly visible, this is the core substantive provision referenced alongside others used in the case context.
§ 64 Abs. II JVV
This provision is listed among the norms applied to the case, likely supporting the imposition or review of the disciplinary sanction.
§ 165 Abs. I JVV
This provision is listed among the norms applied to the case, likely supporting the imposition or review of the disciplinary sanction.
§ 23b Abs. I lit. a StJVG
This provision is listed among the norms applied to the case, likely related to the procedural or substantive grounds for the disciplinary action.
§ 23c Abs. I StJVG
This provision is listed among the norms applied to the case, likely related to the procedural or substantive grounds for the disciplinary action.
§ 23c Abs. I lit. e StJVG
This provision is listed among the norms applied to the case, likely related to the procedural or substantive grounds for the disciplinary action.
Generato dall'IA
VB.2023.00473
Correctional Facility Inmate Disciplinary Sanction Upheld
VB.2022.00566
Inmate Disciplinary Action Upheld for Insult and Disobedience
VB.2019.00064
Inmate Disciplinary Penalty Upheld for Threatening Official Order
VB.2023.00451
Inmate Disciplinary Action Upheld for Altercation and Drug Test Obstruction

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 91 Abs. I StGB

This article appears to form the basis for the disciplinary penalty upheld, although the specific article applied in the dispositive is not directly visible, this is the core substantive provision referenced alongside others used in the case context.

Art. 91 Abs. II StGB

This article appears to form the basis for the disciplinary penalty upheld, although the specific article applied in the dispositive is not directly visible, this is the core substantive provision referenced alongside others used in the case context.

Art. 91 Abs. III StGB

This article appears to form the basis for the disciplinary penalty upheld, although the specific article applied in the dispositive is not directly visible, this is the core substantive provision referenced alongside others used in the case context.

§ 64 Abs. II JVV

This provision is listed among the norms applied to the case, likely supporting the imposition or review of the disciplinary sanction.

§ 165 Abs. I JVV

This provision is listed among the norms applied to the case, likely supporting the imposition or review of the disciplinary sanction.

§ 23b Abs. I lit. a StJVG

This provision is listed among the norms applied to the case, likely related to the procedural or substantive grounds for the disciplinary action.

§ 23c Abs. I StJVG

This provision is listed among the norms applied to the case, likely related to the procedural or substantive grounds for the disciplinary action.

§ 23c Abs. I lit. e StJVG

This provision is listed among the norms applied to the case, likely related to the procedural or substantive grounds for the disciplinary action.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2023.00467

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=223749&W10_KEY=13317468&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2023.00467 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 04.01.2024 · Spruchkörper: · 3. Abteilung/Einzelrichter · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Straf- und Massnahmenvollzug · Betreff: · Disziplinarstrafe · Disziplinarstrafe. Der Beschwerdegegner disziplinierte den Beschwerdeführer zu Recht mit drei Tagen Telefonverbot mit Privatpersonen, nachdem Letzterer unerlaubterweise während der Arbeitszeit ein Telefonat mit einer Privatperson geführt hatte. Daraus, dass der Beschwerdeführer geltend macht, neu auf der Abteilung gewesen und mit dem Wochenplan sowie den Arbeitszeiten noch nicht vertraut gewesen zu sein, kann er nichts zu seinen Gunsten ableiten (E. 3.3).

Die Sanktion erweist sich unter den gegebenen Umständen zwar als streng, aber insgesamt und mit Blick auf die mehrfachen Disziplinierungen des Beschwerdeführers nicht als unverhältnismässig. Da das Freikonto des Beschwerdeführers einen Minussaldo aufwies, konnte keine Busse verhängt werden (E. 3.5). Abweisung. · --- · Stichworte: · ANORDNUNG IM STRAF- UND MASSNAHMENVOLLZUG DISZIPLINARSANKTION DISZIPLINARSTRAFE DISZIPLINARVERFAHREN ORDNUNGSVORSCHRIFT SANKTION STRAFVOLLZUG TELEFONGESPRÄCH VERHÄLTNISMÄSSIGKEIT · Rechtsnormen: · § 64 Abs. II JVV § 165 Abs. I JVV Art. 91 Abs. I StGB Art. 91 Abs. II StGB Art. 91 Abs. III StGB § 23b Abs. I lit. a StJVG § 23c Abs. I StJVG § 23c Abs. I lit. e StJVG · Publikationen:

· - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4