Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VB.2023.00463 • VG ZH VB.2023.00463 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Procedural Orders for Supplementary Documentation in Retroactive Building Permit Case

Numero d'incarto VB.2023.00463
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The administrative court addressed an appeal challenging procedural orders requiring the submission of supplementary documents, specifically an operating concept for a retroactive building permit, and determined whether this constituted a final or appealable interim decision. The court reasoned that the measures ordered did not cause irreparable harm, classifying the decision as a challengeable interim decision regarding procedural directives, but ultimately upheld the authority of the issuing body to make such a ruling, leading to the dismissal of the appeal insofar as it was admissible, and denied compensation for the public entity.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Aufforderung zur Einreichung von ergänzenden Unterlagen | [Prozessleitende Anordnungen; Einholung eines Betriebskonzepts für nachträgliche Baubewilligung] Auslegung der verfügten Massnahmen; Qualifikation als Zwischenentscheid (E. 1). Die verfügten Massnahmen bewirken keinen nicht wiedergutzumachenden Nachteil (E. 2). Soweit die Zuständigkeit zum Erlass der prozessleitenden Verfügung betreffend, liegt ein anfechtbarer Zwischenentscheid vor (E. 2.2); die Zuständigkeit ist jedoch nicht zu beanstanden (E. 4). Keine Parteientschädigung für das Gemeinwesen (E. 6.2). Abweisung, soweit Eintreten.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza edilizia a posteriori decisione incidentale impugnabile decisioni incidentali disposizioni supplementari e finali autorità amministrativa edificio pubblico

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 91 BGG
This provision, concerning the admissibility of appeals against interlocutory decisions, was relevant to the court's decision on entry into the merits.
Art. 92 BGG
This provision, concerning the admissibility of appeals against interlocutory decisions, was relevant to the court's decision on entry into the merits.
Art. 92 Abs. I BGG
This provision, concerning the admissibility of appeals against interlocutory decisions, was relevant to the court's decision on entry into the merits.
Art. 92 Abs. II BGG
This provision, concerning the admissibility of appeals against interlocutory decisions, was relevant to the court's decision on entry into the merits.
Art. 93 Abs. I lit. a BGG
This provision was cited in connection with the dismissal of the appeal concerning the non-irreparable disadvantage.
Art. 93 Abs. I lit. b BGG
This provision was cited in connection with the declaration that the appeal concerning the procedural order was a challengeable interlocutory decision.
Art. 9 BVV
Art. 11 Abs. III BVV
This provision was cited regarding the requirements for the operating concept (Betriebskonzept) for the subsequent building permit.
Generato dall'IA
VB.2009.00660
Appeal Regarding Retroactive Building Permit Procedure and Forfeiture of Appeal Rights
VB.2023.00535
Building Permit Appeal on Mootness of Prior Objections
VB.2016.00083
Building Permit Appeal Regarding Judicial Recusal and Interim Decision Appealability
VB.2018.00451
Building Permit Reconsideration During Appeal Proceedings
VB.2014.00275
Administrative Appeal Regarding Subsequent Building Permit for Deviation from Approved Plans

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 Abs. I lit. a BGG

This provision was cited in connection with the dismissal of the appeal concerning the non-irreparable disadvantage.

Art. 93 Abs. I lit. b BGG

This provision was cited in connection with the declaration that the appeal concerning the procedural order was a challengeable interlocutory decision.

Art. 91 BGG

This provision, concerning the admissibility of appeals against interlocutory decisions, was relevant to the court's decision on entry into the merits.

Art. 92 BGG

This provision, concerning the admissibility of appeals against interlocutory decisions, was relevant to the court's decision on entry into the merits.

Art. 92 Abs. I BGG

This provision, concerning the admissibility of appeals against interlocutory decisions, was relevant to the court's decision on entry into the merits.

Art. 92 Abs. II BGG

This provision, concerning the admissibility of appeals against interlocutory decisions, was relevant to the court's decision on entry into the merits.

Art. 11 Abs. III BVV

This provision was cited regarding the requirements for the operating concept (Betriebskonzept) for the subsequent building permit.

§ 19a Abs. I VRG

This provision was cited in relation to the costs assessment for the appeal.

§ 19a Abs. II VRG

This provision was cited in relation to the costs assessment for the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2023.00463

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=224748&W10_KEY=13317456&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2023.00463 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 27.02.2025 · Spruchkörper: · 3. Abteilung/3. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Das Bundesgericht hat eine Beschwerde in öffentlich-rechtlichen Angelegenheiten gegen diesen Entscheid am 19.05.2025 abgewiesen. · Rechtsgebiet: · Raumplanungs-, Bau- und Umweltrecht · Betreff: · Aufforderung zur Einreichung von ergänzenden Unterlagen · [Prozessleitende Anordnungen; Einholung eines Betriebskonzepts für nachträgliche Baubewilligung] Auslegung der verfügten Massnahmen;

Qualifikation als Zwischenentscheid (E. 1). Die verfügten Massnahmen bewirken keinen nicht wiedergutzumachenden Nachteil (E. 2). Soweit die Zuständigkeit zum Erlass der prozessleitenden Verfügung betreffend, liegt ein anfechtbarer Zwischenentscheid vor (E. 2.2); die Zuständigkeit ist jedoch nicht zu beanstanden (E. 4). Keine Parteientschädigung für das Gemeinwesen (E. 6.2). Abweisung, soweit Eintreten. · --- · Stichworte: · BETRIEBSKONZEPT NACHTRÄGLICHE BAUBEWILLIGUNG NICHT WIEDERGUTZUMACHENDER NACHTEIL PARTEIENTSCHÄDIGUNG GEMEINWESEN PROZESSLEITENDE ANORDNUNG PROZESSLEITENDE VERFÜGUNG/ANORDNUNG ZUSTÄNDIGKEIT ZWANGSMASSNAHMEN ZWISCHENENTSCHEID · Rechtsnormen:

· Art. 91 BGG Art. 92 BGG Art. 92 Abs. I BGG Art. 92 Abs. II BGG Art. 93 Abs. I lit. a BGG Art. 93 Abs. I lit. b BGG Art. 9 BVV Art. 11 Abs. III BVV § 341 PBG Art. 25 Abs. II RPG § 17 Abs. II lit. a VRG § 19a Abs. I VRG § 19a Abs. II VRG · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4