Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2022 1 • KG SZ STK 2022 1 Generato dall'IA

Appeal and Cross-Appeal Regarding False Certification, Forgery, Fraud, and Money Laundering Convictions

Numero d'incarto STK 2022 1
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal and cross-appeal against a lower court's judgment concerning multiple offenses including incitement to multiple instances of obtaining a false certification, forgery of documents, obtaining a false certification, fraud, and professional money laundering, where the appellant was the accused and the opposing parties were the public prosecutor and two private claimants. The court's reasoning for its verdict is not detailed in this excerpt, as this text serves only to identify the parties, the subject matter of the appeal, and the court date.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Anstiftung zur mehrfachen Erschleichung einer falschen Beurkundung, Urkundenfälschung, Erschleichung einer falschen Beurkundung, Betrug, gewerbsmässige Geldwäscherei | Strafgesetzbuch

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
falsità in documenti riciclaggio di denaro sviamento della giustizia perseguimento penale per truffa motivi probatori natura dell'infrazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 362 Abs. 1 StPO
This provision was used to reject the appeal as unfounded.
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO
This provision was used to reject the cross-appeal as unfounded.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO
This provision was used to order the appellant to pay the court costs.
Art. 68 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO
This provision was used to order the appellant to pay procedural costs to the private complainants.
Generato dall'IA
STK 2019 30
Appeal Concerning Conviction for Fraud and Document Forgery
STK 2017 66
Appeal and Cross-Appeal Regarding Convictions for Theft, Fraud, False Accusation, and Related Offenses
STK 2022 59
Appeal and Cross-Appeal Regarding Fraud, Forgery, Bookkeeping Violations, and Deportation
STK 2021 45
Appeal Concerning Embezzlement, Forgery, and Confiscation
STK 2019 1
Appeal of Fraud Conviction

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 362 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision was used to reject the appeal as unfounded.

Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision was used to reject the cross-appeal as unfounded.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision was used to order the appellant to pay the court costs.

Art. 68 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO

This provision was used to order the appellant to pay procedural costs to the private complainants.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 27. Dezember 2024 \n STK 2022 1 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichter Walter Züger, Ilaria Beringer, Monique Schnell Luchsinger und Pius Kistler, Gerichtsschreiber Alen Draganovic. |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter, Berufungsführer und Anschlussberufungsgegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 3. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde, Berufungsgegnerin und Anschlussberufungsführerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, 3. E.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n betreffend |\n Anstiftung zur mehrfachen Erschleichung einer falschen Beurkundung, Urkundenfälschung, Erschleichung einer falschen Beurkundung, Betrug, gewerbsmässige Geldwäscherei |\n

\n\n

\n (Berufung und Anschlussberufung gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 28. Mai 2021, SGO 2018 21);- \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: