Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
11 08 74 • KG LU 11 08 74 Generato dall'IA

Termination Validity During Partial Incapacity Under Article 336c(1)(b)

Numero d'incarto 11 08 74
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court addressed the validity of a termination issued while an employee was partially incapacitated due to illness, specifically concerning the statutory protection period under Article 336c(1)(b) of the Code of Obligations. The court reasoned that this protective period applies only when the duration and extent of the incapacity make securing new employment by the time the ordinary notice period expires "highly improbable." Because the medical certificate indicated the employee was only unfit for night shifts and could perform regular daytime work, and the employee himself indicated a desire to seek future employment in a different field, the court found that the partial incapacity did not prevent him from finding new work, thus rendering the statutory protection period inapplicable and upholding the original termination as valid.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 336c Abs. 1 lit. b OR. Die Sperrfrist spielt, wenn eine Anstellung des Arbeitnehmers durch einen neuen Arbeitgeber auf den Zeitpunkt des Ablaufs der ordentlichen Kündigungsfrist im Hinblick auf die Ungewissheit über Fortdauer und Ausmass der Arbeitsunfähigkeit höchst unwahrscheinlich erscheint. | OR (Obligationenrecht)

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
durata dell'incapacità lavorativa cessazione d'impiego termine di disdetta capacità lavorativa parziale motivi medici ferie non retribuite

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 336c Abs. 1 lit. b OR

This provision defines the protected period during which an employer cannot terminate employment due to the employee's incapacity for work, which was the central issue regarding the validity of the termination.

Art. 328 OR

Cited by the appellant regarding the employer's breach of the duty of care, although no claim was formally made based on this provision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)

Entscheiddatum: · 24.11.2008

Fallnummer: · 11 08 74

LGVE: · 2008 I Nr. 17

Leitsatz: · Art. 336c Abs. 1 lit. b OR. Die Sperrfrist spielt, wenn eine Anstellung des Arbeitnehmers durch einen neuen Arbeitgeber auf den Zeitpunkt des Ablaufs der ordentlichen Kündigungsfrist im Hinblick auf die Ungewissheit über Fortdauer und Ausmass der Arbeitsunfähigkeit höchst unwahrscheinlich erscheint.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.