Apprenticeship Contract Formal Defects Nullify Agreement
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe court qualified a contract for training as a hairdresser as an apprenticeship contract under the Code of Obligations (OR) rather than a mere instruction contract, based on the contract's focus on practical training over theory and its required duration for a final assessment. Because the agreement was deemed a contract of apprenticeship, it was subject to the strict formal requirements of Art. 344a OR, necessitating that all elements listed in paragraph 2, including remuneration, probationary period, working hours, and vacation, be in writing for validity. Since the written documentation failed to specify these crucial terms, the contract was declared void due to a formal defect, leading the relationship to be treated as a valid employment until termination, requiring the payment of presumed wages to the trainee.
Regesto Legislator
UfficialeArt. 344 und 344a Abs. 1 und 2 OR. Qualifizierung eines Ausbildungsvertrages für Damen- und Herrencoiffeuse als Lehrvertrag und nicht als Unterrichtsvertrag. Im Lehrvertrag bedürfen alle in Art. 344a Abs. 2 OR aufgeführten Vertragsgegenstände der Schriftform. | OR (Obligationenrecht)
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IAGiurisprudenza citata
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThese articles establish the legal basis for qualifying the contract as a contract of apprenticeship and outline the formal requirements (written form) for its validity.
Applied because the contract was deemed invalid due to a formal defect, regulating the treatment of the relationship until termination.
Cited as the general provision stipulating that the formal defect (of the apprenticeship contract) results in the nullity of the contract.
Cited in conjunction with Art. 320 Abs. 3 OR to determine the consequences of the invalidity of an apprenticeship contract.
Testo completo
Rechtsprechung Luzern
Instanz: · Obergericht
Abteilung: · I. Kammer
Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht)
Entscheiddatum: · 05.04.2006
Fallnummer: · 11 05 32.1
LGVE: · 2006 I Nr. 19
Leitsatz: · Art. 344 und 344a Abs. 1 und 2 OR. Qualifizierung eines Ausbildungsvertrages für Damen- und Herrencoiffeuse als Lehrvertrag und nicht als Unterrichtsvertrag. Im Lehrvertrag bedürfen alle in Art. 344a Abs. 2 OR aufgeführten Vertragsgegenstände der Schriftform.
Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.