Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
02 04 16 • KG LU 02 04 16 Generato dall'IA

Appeal on Child Support Binding Status and Provisional Spousal Contribution Awards

Numero d'incarto 02 04 16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In an appeal concerning divorce ancillary matters, the court held that if spousal support remains contested, the child support amounts fixed in the lower court's initial judgment are not binding on the appellate court, even if that part was not appealed, because child support and spousal support together form a whole impacting the obligated party's capacity. Furthermore, the court ruled that claims for contributions toward building an adequate retirement provision cannot typically be granted in provisional measures proceedings, as such complex assessments belong to the final divorce judgment under relevant provisions concerning spousal support and asset division.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 125 Abs. 2 Ziff. 8, 137 Abs. 2 , und 148 Abs. 1 ZGB. Bleibt vor Obergericht der Ehegattenunterhalt streitig, so sind die im Amtsgerichtsurteil festgesetzten Kinderunterhaltsbeiträge auch für den Massnahmerichter im Appellationsverfahren nicht verbindlich, selbst wenn dagegen nicht appelliert wurde. Unterhaltsbeiträge für den Aufbau einer angemessenen Altersvorsorge können regelmässig nicht im vorsorglichen Massnahmeverfahren zugesprochen werden, sondern sind Gegenstand des Scheidungsurteils. | Familienrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
contributo di mantenimento cautelare procedura di divorzio provvedimenti provvisori credito di contributi pensionamento durata del mantenimento post-matrimoniale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 145 aZGB
Art. 137 ZGB
Art. 148 Abs. 1 ZGB
This provision was cited in the reasoning to explain why the child support amounts from the lower court decision did not attain final legal force because the spousal support was appealed.
Art. 163 ZGB
Art. 125 ZGB
Leitsatz: · Art. 125 Abs.
Art. 137 Abs. 2 ZGB
This provision governs the necessary scope of provisional measures, which the court used to deny the claim for pre-emptive retirement provision payments.
Art. 125 Abs. 2 Ziff. 8 ZGB
This provision, concerning post-divorce maintenance, is cited as the proper forum for assessing the adequacy of the applicant's retirement provision, justifying the denial in the provisional measures procedure.
Art. 122 ZGB

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
5P.341/2002
Wife's Appeal Against Spousal Maintenance Calculation Dismissed on Grounds of Income Assessment and Surplus Income Allocation
Generato dall'IA
OG 1992 25
Child Support Finality Dependent on Spousal Support Review
22 09 102
Appeal on Modification of Spousal and Child Support Due to Changed Financial Circumstances
22 99 123
Spousal Support Calculation and Consideration of Inherited Assets
02 01 12
Modification of Provisional Support Following Final Divorce Decree
22 03 126
Modification of Support Due to Disability and Uncertain Future Income

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 137 Abs. 2 ZGB

This provision governs the necessary scope of provisional measures, which the court used to deny the claim for pre-emptive retirement provision payments.

Art. 125 Abs. 2 Ziff. 8 ZGB

This provision, concerning post-divorce maintenance, is cited as the proper forum for assessing the adequacy of the applicant's retirement provision, justifying the denial in the provisional measures procedure.

Art. 148 Abs. 1 ZGB

This provision was cited in the reasoning to explain why the child support amounts from the lower court decision did not attain final legal force because the spousal support was appealed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 07.12.2004

Fallnummer: · 02 04 16

LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 4

Leitsatz: · Art. 125 Abs. 2 Ziff. 8, 137 Abs. 2 , und 148 Abs. 1 ZGB. Bleibt vor Obergericht der Ehegattenunterhalt streitig, so sind die im Amtsgerichtsurteil festgesetzten Kinderunterhaltsbeiträge auch für den Massnahmerichter im Appellationsverfahren nicht verbindlich, selbst wenn dagegen nicht appelliert wurde. Unterhaltsbeiträge für den Aufbau einer angemessenen Altersvorsorge können regelmässig nicht im vorsorglichen Massnahmeverfahren zugesprochen werden, sondern sind Gegenstand des Scheidungsurteils.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.