Legislator Corpus juridique & Jurisprudence
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
Încheierea nr. 4217/2013 Rejeté (Dismissed) Structuré par IA

Încheierea nr. 4217/2013 — Procedural motion for transfer of civil case jurisdiction denied due to lack of legal grounds

Numéro de cause Încheierea nr. 4217/2013 (ICCJ_99920)
Autorité / Tribunal
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Juridiction Roumanie — Jurisprudence (RO)
Ouvrir la source officielle ↗ Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse de l'arrêt (Faits & Considérants)

Structuré par IA

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition filed by the plaintiff to transfer Case No. 547/205/2011 from the Câmpulung Muscel Court to a different venue, a decision that is final and not subject to appeal. The dispute concerned a procedural request for jurisdictional transfer (strămutare) where the plaintiff sought to move the trial to a different judge or court, but the Public Ministry representative concluded that the request should be rejected. The court determined that the petition lacked the requisite legal grounds for relocation, noting that the case was properly registered on the docket with a scheduled hearing date, thereby upholding the original court's jurisdiction and dismissing the challenge without altering the substantive merits of the underlying civil matter.

Regeste / Sommaire juridique

Structuré par IA
The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition filed by the plaintiff to transfer Case No. 547/205/2011 from the Câmpulung Muscel Court to a different venue, a decision that is final and not subject to appeal. The dispute concerned a procedural request for jurisdictional transfer (strămutare) where the plaintiff sought to move the trial to a different judge or court, but the Public Ministry representative concluded that the request should be rejected. The court determined that the petition lacked the requisite legal grounds for relocation, noting that the case was properly registered on the docket with a scheduled hearing date, thereby upholding the original court's jurisdiction and dismissing the challenge without altering the substantive merits of the underlying civil matter.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte intégral de la décision — Încheierea nr. 4217/2013

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că cererea de strămutare este legal timbrată, comunicată intimaților. De asemenea, se arată că potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor Dosarul nr. 547/205/2011 a cărui strămutare se solicită se află pe rolul judecătoriei Câmpulung și are termen de judecată în data de 8 octombrie 2013.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petentul N.C., prin care solicită strămutarea cauzei ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 547/205/2011 al Judecătoriei Câmpulung Muscel.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 2 octombrie 2013.