Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
III PK 107/04 Généré par l'IA

Cassation dismissed: University contract without dean's request does not constitute academic appointment under higher education law.

Numéro de cause III PK 107/04
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a labor dispute involving a university professor. The court found that while the rector signed an employment contract, it violated Article 86 of the Higher Education Act because it lacked a dean's request and faculty council opinion required for academic appointments. Consequently, the contract could not transform into an appointment-based employment relationship, and the fixed-term contract did not convert to indefinite under labor law provisions.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 92 ust. 1 ustawy o szkolnictwie wyższym; Art. 86 ust. 3 ustawy o szkolnictwie wyższym: An employment contract signed by a university rector without a dean's request and faculty council opinion does not constitute an academic appointment, as such appointments require strict statutory compliance.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
academic appointment higher education law employment contract university rector labor dispute statutory compliance cassation appeal

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 92 ust. 1 of the Higher Education Act
Art. 86 ust. 3 of the Higher Education Act
Art. 251 of the Labor Code
Art. 393 § 12 of the Code of Civil Procedure
art. 58 k.c
art. 251 k.p
art. 18 k.p
art. 113 k.p
art. 32 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
art. 382 k.p.c

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
I PRN 45/93
I PKN 360/97
Employment contract with appointed employee treated as appointment if authorized organ concluded it.
I PZP 14/93
I PKN 517/99
Supreme Court dismissed cassation; teacher's fixed-term contract was less favorable than mandatory appointment under Teacher's Card. The court found no legal error in the lower court's assessment of the teacher's employment conditions and intent.
I PKN 235/99
Supreme Court dismisses teacher's claim for indefinite contract, ruling Article 10 of Teachers' Charter excludes Labor Code Art. 251.
I PKN 709/99
Supreme Court dismisses appeal when special teacher law exhaustively defines fixed-term employment scenarios.
I PKN 370/97
Supreme Court reverses lower court for misapplying Article 25-1 of Labor Code regarding contract extension.
II CK 442/02

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet