Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I PKN 360/97 Généré par l'IA

Employment contract with appointed employee treated as appointment if authorized organ concluded it.

Numéro de cause I PKN 360/97
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for reinstatement and back pay, quashing the lower court's judgment. The plaintiff argued she was employed under appointment based on the Head of the Supreme Control Authority's approval, but the lower court found the Department Director lacked authority to conclude the contract. The Supreme Court held that the Department Director's signature was insufficient for an appointment, requiring the Head's direct authorization, and remanded the case to determine if the relationship was actually an appointment or a contract.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Ustawa o NIK art. 15 ust. 1; Ustawa o NIK art. 15 ust. 4: An employment contract concluded with an employee who should be appointed under mandatory law is treated as an appointment only if the authorized organ concluded the contract.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
employment contract appointment system authorized organ reinstatement claim labor law dispute

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
art. 15 ust. 1 ustawy o NIK
art. 15 ust. 4 ustawy o NIK
art. 23 § 1 KP

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet