Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II PK 117/04 Généré par l'IA

Union official dismissed from work for severe breach of duty; reinstatement denied but damages awarded.

Numéro de cause II PK 117/04
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the union official's appeal to reinstate him after his employer terminated his contract without notice. The court found that his failure to perform basic duties and ignore safety documentation orders constituted a particularly serious breach of employment obligations. Consequently, while the request for reinstatement was rejected, the employee retained the right to claim damages for the procedural violation of his union protection status.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 25 ust. 2 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Art. 56 k.p.; Art. 8 k.p.: A union official's particularly serious breach of duty justifies dismissal and denial of reinstatement, but does not preclude a claim for damages as an alternative remedy for procedural violations.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
union official dismissal serious breach of duty reinstatement denied damages alternative procedural violation union protection status termination without notice

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 25 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 56 k.p.
Art. 8 k.p.
Art. 393 § 15 k.p.c.
art. 8 k.p
art. 52 § 2 k.p
art. 30 § 4 k.p
art. 385 k.p.c
art. 56 § 1 k.p

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
I PKN 571/97
Supreme Court dismisses reinstatement claim for selling private drugs during work, allowing damages instead.
I PKN 23/00
Supreme Court dismissed union leader's appeal for reinstatement due to severe breach of duty and intoxication. Union protections do not shield from justified sanctions. Court rejected claim of procedural errors regarding evidence. Union leader cannot use special protections against valid termination. Court upheld employer's right to sanction for intoxication. Union leader failed to prove sobriety after delay. Special protections apply only to those without severe breaches.
I PKN 148/01
I PZP 40/93
I PRN 103/95
Special union protection does not bar labor court from ex officio choosing alternative claims if primary claim is unreasonable.
I PKN 63/97
Supreme Court dismisses reinstatement claim when workplace conflict makes return unreasonable, allowing damages instead.
I PKN 215/98
Polish Supreme Court dismissed cassation, ruling employee's post-work drinking did not constitute gross misconduct warranting dismissal.
I PKN 527/99
I PKN 552/99

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet