Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I PKN 110/99 Généré par l'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal when employee's brief conflict with supervisor does not justify denying reinstatement.

Numéro de cause I PKN 110/99
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court of Poland dismissed the employer's appeal, reinstating the employee to his former position. The court found that the employee's brief absence due to a sudden construction project delay did not constitute a serious, long-term, or deeply rooted conflict with his supervisor. Consequently, the lower court's decision to award damages instead of reinstatement violated the legal requirement that such a remedy is only appropriate when reinstatement is unfeasible or pointless due to significant misconduct or persistent conflict.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 8 KP; Art. 45 § 2 KP: Reinstatement to work is not considered unfeasible or pointless merely due to a conflict between an employee and a supervisor unless the conflict is serious, long-term, deep, and caused by the employee's fault.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
reinstatement to work unfeasible remedy employee fault labor dispute Supreme Court ruling

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 8 KP
Art. 45 § 2 KP
Art. 56 § 2 KP
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 382 KPC
Art. 98 § 1 KPC
art. 87 Konstytucji

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
I PKN 63/97
Supreme Court dismisses reinstatement claim when workplace conflict makes return unreasonable, allowing damages instead.
I PKN 374/97
Supreme Court dismisses reinstatement claim due to deep, long-term conflict with employer making return to work uncalled for.
I PKN 173/97
Employer's failure to state a valid reason for dismissal violates termination rules under Labor Code Art. 30 and 45.
I PKN 572/97
Supreme Court dismisses appeal, upholding that hiring a replacement does not make reinstatement impossible or pointless under labor law.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet