Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I PKN 173/97 Généré par l'IA

Employer's failure to state a valid reason for dismissal violates termination rules under Labor Code Art. 30 and 45.

Numéro de cause I PKN 173/97
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Pologne (PL)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the employer's cassation appeal, upholding the lower court's finding that the employer's dismissal was invalid. The court ruled that the employer failed to specify a valid reason for termination as required by law, constituting a breach of statutory obligations. Consequently, the dismissal was deemed ineffective, and the employee's claim to reinstatement was supported despite the existence of a labor dispute.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 30 § 4 KP; Art. 45 § 1 KP: The employer has an obligation to state a valid reason for dismissal; failure to do so renders the dismissal ineffective, and a labor dispute does not preclude reinstatement.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
invalid dismissal failure to state reason reinstatement to work labor dispute conflict employer obligation Labor Code provisions casation appeal

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 30 § 4 KP
Art. 45 § 1 KP
Art. 45 § 2 KP
Art. 393 § 12 KPC

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
I PZP 48/75
I PZP 2/94
Employer must rehire employee for economic reasons even if another person is hired in the same role.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet