Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
21 08 42 • KG LU 21 08 42 Généré par l'IA

Community Service Conversion to Custodial Sentence Upheld Due to Third-Party Fine Payment Prohibition

Numéro de cause 21 08 42
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed an appeal challenging the conversion of an unfulfilled community service penalty into a ten-day custodial sentence, where the appellant requested conversion instead to a fine, funded by a third party. The court reasoned that although a fine generally takes precedence over custodial substitution under relevant law, the fine is inherently personal and must be paid by the convicted individual; if a third party covers the economic burden, the penalty loses its punitive character, thus upholding the original decision to convert the penalty to imprisonment because allowing a third-party payment would violate the principle of personal liability for a fine.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 34 StGB, Art. 39 StGB; Community Service Conversion to Custodial Sentence Upheld Due to Third-Party Fine Payment Prohibition: The court reasoned that although a fine generally takes precedence over custodial substitution under relevant law, the fine is inherently personal and must be paid by the convicted individual; if a third party covers the economic burden, the penalty loses its punitive character, thus upholding the original decision to convert the penalty to imprisonment because allowing a third-party payment would violate the principle of personal liability for a fine.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
paiement de l'amende peine privative de liberté versement en mains d'un tiers responsabilité personnelle droit économique exemption de peine

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 34 StGB

This provision is cited in the decision summary/headnote and used as the basis for the ruling regarding the personal nature of the fine.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 13.06.2008

Fallnummer: · 21 08 42

LGVE: · 2008 I Nr. 43

Leitsatz: · Art. 34 StGB. Die Geldstrafe ist höchstpersönlicher Natur und muss daher vom Verurteilten selbst geleistet werden.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.