Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
21 08 22 • KG LU 21 08 22 Généré par l'IA

Excessive Self-Defense in Battery Case Regarding Martial Arts Training

Numéro de cause 21 08 22
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant was convicted of simple battery committed in an excessive self-defense situation after striking the complainant, who had first grabbed the appellant's arm and raised a fist to strike him, resulting in a nasal fracture. The court reasoned that when assessing the proportionality of a self-defense measure under Articles 15 and 16 of the Criminal Code, the specific circumstances of the defender, including their training, must be considered; as the appellant was an experienced martial arts instructor, he should have employed a less dangerous and readily available defensive technique, such as a passive block or a controlled counter, rather than executing a direct and powerful blow to the face, meaning the application of excessive force justified the finding of a self-defense excess, not a full acquittal.

Regeste Legislator

Officiel

Art. 15 und 16 StGB; Vorliegen eines Notwehrexzesses. Die Verhältismässigkeit eines Notwehrmittels ist auch anhand der konkreten Verhältnisse beim Notwehrhandelnden zu beurteilen. | Strafrecht

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
excès de légitime défense tentative de lésions corporelles simples classement pour lésions corporelles défense pénale peine corporelle crime

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 123 Ziff. 1 Abs. 1 StGB
Art. 33 Abs. 2 Satz
Art. 16 Abs. 1 StGB
Art. 15 StGB
Leitsatz: · Art. 15 und 16 StGB; Vorliegen eines Notwehrexzesses.
Art. 99 BGG
§ 282 Abs. 1 StPO
Used to order the appellant to bear the costs of the cassation proceedings.
§ 60 lit. d KoV
Used to determine and award the appellant's party compensation to the private party.
Art. 78 ff. BGG
Cited to explain the admissibility requirements for an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court against the final cantonal decision.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BGE 107 IV 15
BGE 101 IV 120
BGE 117 IV 17
Généré par l'IA
21 04 44
Homicide Self-Defense Excessive Force Justification
21 08 55
Appellate Court Overturns Battery Conviction Based on Insufficient Proof of Pattern
4M 11 21
Self-Defense Justification for Private Recording Under Threat
21 07 97
Simple Assault Conviction Affirmed; Acquittal on Second Assault Upheld Due to Reasonable Doubt
7W 14 18 7W 14 19
Taxpayer v. Tax Authorities: Martial Arts School Profit Motive Determination

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 282 Abs. 1 StPO

Used to order the appellant to bear the costs of the cassation proceedings.

§ 60 lit. d KoV

Used to determine and award the appellant's party compensation to the private party.

Art. 78 ff. BGG

Cited to explain the admissibility requirements for an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court against the final cantonal decision.

Art. 90 ff. BGG

Cited to explain the admissibility requirements for an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court against the final cantonal decision.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 09.05.2008

Fallnummer: · 21 08 22

LGVE:

Leitsatz: · Art. 15 und 16 StGB; Vorliegen eines Notwehrexzesses. Die Verhältismässigkeit eines Notwehrmittels ist auch anhand der konkreten Verhältnisse beim Notwehrhandelnden zu beurteilen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.