Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 22/03 AI generated

Employer violating social fund spending rules cannot invoke general clauses to avoid liability for damages.

Case Number I PK 22/03
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of a union's claim for the return of social fund misappropriation. The employer argued that general clauses in the Civil Code barred liability, but the court held that violating statutory social criteria inherently breaches general principles of coexistence. Consequently, the employer is precluded from using general clauses to escape responsibility for damages caused by such violations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 8 ust. 1 ustawy o zakładowym funduszu świadczeń socjalnych; Art. 8 k.p.: An employer violating statutory social criteria for fund expenditure cannot invoke general clauses to avoid liability, as such violations inherently breach general principles of coexistence and social-economic purpose.

Keywords

AI generated
social fund expenditure general clauses civil code liability social criteria coexistence principles misappropriation damages employer liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 8 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 4 marca 1994 r. o zakładowym funduszu świadczeń socjalnych
Art. 8 k.p.
Art. 393 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 8 k.p
art. 368 § 1 pkt 5 k.p.c
art. 385 k.p.c
art. 378 § 1 k.p.c
art. 39312 k.p.c
art. 108 § 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text