I PKN 552/97
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; drunk employee cannot claim social conduct protection for dismissal.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a cooperative member seeking reinstatement after being expelled for drunkenness. The plaintiff argued for protection under Article 8 of the Labor Code, but the court found he violated social coexistence norms by arriving drunk and acting aggressively. Consequently, the court ruled that such an employee cannot validly invoke social conduct protections to challenge a dismissal based on severe breach of duties.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 8 Kodeksu pracy; Art. 193 § 1 Prawo spółdzielcze: An employee who disregards and violates social coexistence norms cannot claim protection under Article 8 of the Labor Code regarding dismissal for drunkenness.
Keywords
AI generated
drunkenness at work
social coexistence norms
cooperative member expulsion
Labor Code protection
severe breach of duties
dismissal without notice
cassation appeal dismissal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 8 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 193 § 1 Prawo spółdzielcze
Art. 193 § 4 Prawo spółdzielcze
Art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 Kodeksu pracy
Art. 393 § 12 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego