Legislator Corpus giuridico & Giurisprudenza
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
6 B 12/14, 6 B 12/14 (6 C 40/14) Accolto (Allowed) Generato dall'IA

6 B 12/14, 6 B 12/14 (6 C 40/14) — Telecommunications regulation: judicial review standards for the agency's discretion in calculating efficient service costs under § 31, 32 TKG

Numero d'incarto 6 B 12/14, 6 B 12/14 (6 C 40/14) (WBRE410020418)
Autorità giudiziaria
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Giurisdizione Germania — Giurisprudenza (DE)
Apri la fonte ufficiale ↗ Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi della sentenza (Oggetto del contendere & Esito)

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) permitted the admitted party’s appeal against the non-admission of the revision, granting the revision and allowing the case to be decided on its merits, thereby ruling in favor of the appealing party regarding the procedural threshold for review. The dispute concerned telecommunications regulation, specifically the calculation of cost recovery and hourly rates for the provision of services under the German Telecommunications Act (TKG), challenging whether the Federal Network Agency possessed a margin of discretion in determining these costs. The decisive legal basis was § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, which required the court to assess whether the issue had fundamental significance, specifically addressing the standards for judicial review of the agency’s discretion in calculating efficient service costs under §§ 31 Abs. 2 and 32 Abs. 1 TKG.

Massima giurisprudenziale / Regesto

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO; § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG — § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO: Main ground for the verdict, cited in the dispositive order to grant the appeal and allow the revision based on the fundamental significance of the case. § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG: Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the determination of the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings. § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG: Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.

Questioni giuridiche chiave & norme applicate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for the verdict, cited in the dispositive order to grant the appeal and allow the revision based on the fundamental significance of the case.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the determination of the amount in dispute in the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied in the dispositive for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute in the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo integrale della sentenza — 6 B 12/14, 6 B 12/14 (6 C 40/14)

Revisionszulassung; Telekommunikation; Entgeltregulierung

[GRUENDE] 1

Die Beschwerde der Beigeladenen gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob und ggf. inwieweit das Telekommunikationsgesetz der Bundesnetzagentur bei der Ermittlung der Kosten der effizienten Leistungsbereitstellung nach § 31 Abs. 2 Satz 1 des Telekommunikationsgesetzes vom 22. Juni 2004 (TKG) bzw. nach § 32 Abs. 1 Satz 1 TKG in der Fassung des Gesetzes vom 3. Mai 2012 (BGBl I S. 958) in Bezug auf die Stundensätze, die der Ermittlung von (Einmal-)Entgelten zugrunde liegen, einen Beurteilungsspielraum einräumt und nach welchen Maßstäben insoweit die gerichtliche Kontrolle erfolgt.

2

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.