Supreme Court allows backdated rent increase claim under Civil Code Art. 907 § 2 if circumstances changed within three years.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal and upheld the lower court's judgment awarding a supplementary pension increase. The plaintiff, a former employee, sought payment for a hypothetical 35th-anniversary bonus that would have been due had he remained employed, arguing this change in circumstances justified a rent adjustment under Civil Code Art. 907 § 2. The court ruled that since the qualifying change occurred in May 2009, the claim became enforceable then and the three-year limitation period had not yet expired when the lawsuit was filed in October 2009.