Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I PK 215/08 Generato dall'IA

Invalid employment contract does not preclude later per facta concludentia agreement on same or different terms.

Numero d'incarto I PK 215/08
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding the validity of a subsequent employment agreement. The lower court found that the invalid 2005 contract did not prevent a new agreement from being formed per facta concludentia based on the parties' conduct. The court upheld this decision, noting that the employer's board had previously evaluated the employee's qualifications positively and that the invalidity of the initial contract did not bar future employment relations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 379 § 1 k.s.h.; An invalid employment contract does not exclude the subsequent conclusion of an employment agreement per facta concludentia on the terms specified in the invalid agreement or on different terms.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
invalid employment contract per facta concludentia subsequent agreement labor law Supreme Court cassation appeal employer liability

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 379 § 1 k.s.h.
Art. 368 § 4 k.s.h.
Art. 370 § 1 k.s.h.
Art. 483 k.s.h.
Art. 231 k.p.c.
Art. 227 k.p.c.
Art. 232 k.p.c.
Art. 328 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 378 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 381 k.p.c.
Art. 382 k.p.c.
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 398 k.p.c.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo