Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
II PK 117/04 Generato dall'IA

Union official dismissed from work for severe breach of duty; reinstatement denied but damages awarded.

Numero d'incarto II PK 117/04
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the union official's appeal to reinstate him after his employer terminated his contract without notice. The court found that his failure to perform basic duties and ignore safety documentation orders constituted a particularly serious breach of employment obligations. Consequently, while the request for reinstatement was rejected, the employee retained the right to claim damages for the procedural violation of his union protection status.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 25 ust. 2 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Art. 56 k.p.; Art. 8 k.p.: A union official's particularly serious breach of duty justifies dismissal and denial of reinstatement, but does not preclude a claim for damages as an alternative remedy for procedural violations.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
union official dismissal serious breach of duty reinstatement denied damages alternative procedural violation union protection status termination without notice

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 25 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 56 k.p.
Art. 8 k.p.
Art. 393 § 15 k.p.c.
art. 8 k.p
art. 52 § 2 k.p
art. 30 § 4 k.p
art. 385 k.p.c
art. 56 § 1 k.p

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
I PKN 571/97
Supreme Court dismisses reinstatement claim for selling private drugs during work, allowing damages instead.
I PKN 23/00
Supreme Court dismissed union leader's appeal for reinstatement due to severe breach of duty and intoxication. Union protections do not shield from justified sanctions. Court rejected claim of procedural errors regarding evidence. Union leader cannot use special protections against valid termination. Court upheld employer's right to sanction for intoxication. Union leader failed to prove sobriety after delay. Special protections apply only to those without severe breaches.
I PKN 148/01
I PZP 40/93
I PRN 103/95
Special union protection does not bar labor court from ex officio choosing alternative claims if primary claim is unreasonable.
I PKN 63/97
Supreme Court dismisses reinstatement claim when workplace conflict makes return unreasonable, allowing damages instead.
I PKN 215/98
Polish Supreme Court dismissed cassation, ruling employee's post-work drinking did not constitute gross misconduct warranting dismissal.
I PKN 527/99
I PKN 552/99

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo