Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
I PKN 285/97 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; employee missed 3-year appeal deadline despite no notice, losing termination validity.

Numero d'incarto I PKN 285/97
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee against his dismissal. The lower courts rejected the claim because the employee failed to appeal the termination within the strict three-year statutory period, despite receiving no specific notice on how to appeal. The Court ruled that the employee's awareness of his termination through subsequent social security decisions precluded a claim of non-negligence for missing the deadline.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 264 § 2 Kodeksu postępowania pracy; Art. 53 § 1 pkt 1 Kodeksu postępowania pracy: An employee cannot successfully claim non-negligence for missing the appeal deadline if the dismissal letter lacked appeal instructions, provided the delay is substantial and the employee was aware of the termination through other official means.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
labor law appeal statutory deadline non-negligence dismissal validity social security notice cassation appeal employee awareness

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 264 § 2 Kodeksu postępowania pracy
Art. 53 § 1 pkt 1 Kodeksu postępowania pracy
Art. 10 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1974 r. o świadczeniach pieniężnych z ubezpieczenia społecznego w razie choroby i macierzyństwa
Art. 393 § 12 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo