I PRN 21/94 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows extension of statute of limitations for labor dispute due to employee's lack of fault and legal inexperience.

Numero d'incarto I PRN 21/94

Autorità giudiziaria Sąd Najwyższy

Giurisdizione

Polonia (PL)

Data della decisione 1994-05-13

Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)

Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court set aside lower court rulings that dismissed an employee's claim for reinstatement due to a missed filing deadline. The employee argued he was not at fault for missing the 14-day limit because of incorrect legal advice and attempts at out-of-court settlement. The court held that the law does not specify a strict form for requesting a deadline extension and requires a subjective assessment of the employee's knowledge and circumstances, finding the lower courts' rigid approach erroneous.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 264 § 2 k.p.; Art. 265 k.p.: The absence of fault in missing a short limitation period must be assessed subjectively based on the employee's education and experience, allowing extensions for minor delays caused by legal misinformation or settlement attempts.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA

labor dispute statute of limitations missed deadline employee fault reinstatement claim subjective assessment legal inexperience

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Art. 264 § 2 k.p.

Art. 265 k.p.

Art. 3 § 2 k.p.c.

Art. 422 § 2 k.p.c.

art. 264 § 2 k.p

art. 52 k.p

art. 3 § 2 k.p.c

art. 265 k.p

art. 264 k.p

art. 422 § 2 k.p.c

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA

III PZP 8/86

Supreme Court allows extension of statute of limitations for labor dispute due to employee's lack of fault and legal inexperience.

Sintesi Legislator

Regesto Legislator

Parole chiave

Disposizioni normative citate

Giurisprudenza citata

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Testo completo