Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 450/19 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2021:rk20210427.2bvr045019 Generato dall'IA

Unjustified constitutional complaint and inadmissible recusal request against a judge not sitting in the deciding chamber

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 450/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint without further reasoning and rejected the accompanying recusal motion against a judge of the Second Senate as obviously inadmissible. The dispute involved a constitutional complaint filed in 2019 alongside a request for the recusal of a specific judge, but the recusal motion failed because the targeted judge was not a member of the specific chamber designated for the decision. The court applied § 93d(1) sentence 3 of the Federal Constitutional Court Act (BVerfGG), which permits omitting the reasoning for non-admission of constitutional complaints, and ruled the decision final and unappealable.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG; Unjustified constitutional complaint and inadmissible recusal request against a judge not sitting in the deciding chamber: Von einer Begründung der Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
domanda di ricusazione motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali diritto alla risoluzione del contratto azione di separazione restituzione in pristino inesigibilità dell'esecuzione dell'allontanamento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Von einer Begründung der Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 142, 1
BVerfGE 142, 1 ; BVerfG, Beschluss der 2.
2 BvR 2079/20
Recusal of chamber members and dismissal of constitutional complaint without substantive review
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 2328/20
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint due to ungrounded recusal request not directed at specific chamber member
2 BvR 2361/16
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint due to unsubstantiated judge recusal motion and lack of sufficient reasoning
2 BvR 43/20
Recusal motion against non-deciding chamber judges dismissed as manifestly inadmissible
2 BvR 750/19
BVerfG: Recusal of constitutional judges for prior adverse decision and substantive admissibility of constitutional complaints
1 BvR 1126/17
Rejection of manifestly inadmissible recusal motions and non-admission of constitutional complaint without further reasoning under § 93d BVerfGG

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahme einer Verfassungsbeschwerde ohne weitere Begründung - Verwerfung eines offensichtlich unzulässigen Ablehnungsgesuchs

[TENOR]

Das Ablehnungsgesuch gegen die Richterin Wallrabenstein wird als unzulässig verworfen.

Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

[GRUENDE]

Das gegen die Richterin Wallrabenstein gerichtete Ablehnungsgesuch ist bereits deshalb offensichtlich unzulässig, weil sie nicht der zur Entscheidung berufenen Kammer angehört (vgl. BVerfGE 142, 1 ; BVerfG, Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 1. Dezember 2020 - 2 BvR 2079/20 -, juris, Rn. 1).

Von einer Begründung der Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.