Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2 BvR 2079/20 ECLI:DE:BVerfG:2020:rk20201201.2bvr207920 Generato dall'IA

Recusal of chamber members and dismissal of constitutional complaint without substantive review

Numero d'incarto 2 BvR 2079/20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Constitutional Court dismissed the constitutional complaint without further reasoning, rendered the application for interim relief moot, and separately dismissed as inadmissible a request for recusal against the President, Vice-President, and a specific judge of the Court. The dispute concerned an attempt to challenge the participation of these officials in the proceedings, which the Court determined was procedurally defective because the challenged individuals did not belong to the specific chamber empowered to decide the matter. Applying § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, the Court concluded that the complaint lacked sufficient prospects of success to warrant a detailed justification for its non-acceptance, thereby allowing the prior procedural status to remain in force.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, § 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG; Recusal of chamber members and dismissal of constitutional complaint without substantive review: The dispute concerned an attempt to challenge the participation of these officials in the proceedings, which the Court determined was procedurally defective because the challenged individuals did not belong to the specific chamber empowered to decide the matter. Applying § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG, the Court concluded that the complaint lacked sufficient prospects of success to warrant a detailed justification for its non-acceptance, thereby allowing the prior procedural status to remain in force.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
motivazione inadeguata delle censure costituzionali oggetto della lite controllo della procedura partecipazione alla procedura fondatezza materiale domanda di ricusazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
Von einer Begründung der Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.
§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG
Cited in the dispositive to declare the application for interim relief moot following the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BVerfGE 142, 1
BVerfGE 142, 1 ; BVerfG, Beschluss des Zweiten Senats vom 6.
2 BvR 341/20
Insufficiently reasoned constitutional complaint and recusal request against unassigned judges
Generato dall'IA
1 BvR 1634/18
Constitutional complaint dismissed without reasoning and abusive recusal motion rejected as inadmissible
2 BvR 750/19
BVerfG: Recusal of constitutional judges for prior adverse decision and substantive admissibility of constitutional complaints
1 BvR 1511/18, 1 BvR 1668/18, 1 BvR 1969/18, 1 BvR 2133/18, 1 BvR 2379/18, 1 BvR 2445/18, 1 BvR 2483/18, 1 BvR 2490/18, 1 BvR 2494/18, 1 BvR 2560/18
Recusal requests targeting non-chamber judges; dispensation with reasoned rejection under § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG
1 BvR 501/18
Constitutional complaint inadmissible for lack of exhaustion of remedies and insufficient substantiation; recusal request dismissed as obviously unfounded.
1 BvR 2328/20
Inadmissibility of constitutional complaint due to ungrounded recusal request not directed at specific chamber member

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG

Cited in the dispositive to declare the application for interim relief moot following the non-acceptance of the constitutional complaint.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Nichtannahme einer Verfassungsbeschwerde ohne weitere Begründung - Verwerfung eines unzulässigen Ablehnungsgesuchs

[TENOR]

1. Das Ablehnungsgesuch gegen den Präsidenten des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, die Vizepräsidentin des Bundesverfassungsgerichts und den Richter Müller wird als unzulässig verworfen.

2. Die Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nicht zur Entscheidung angenommen.

3. Mit der Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird der Antrag auf Erlass einer einstweiligen Anordnung gegenstandslos (§ 40 Abs. 3 GOBVerfG).

[GRUENDE]

Das gegen den Präsidenten des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, die Vizepräsidentin des Bundesverfassungsgerichts und den Richter Müller gerichtete Ablehnungsgesuch ist offensichtlich unzulässig, weil sie nicht der zur Entscheidung berufenen Kammer angehören (vgl. BVerfGE 142, 1 ; BVerfG, Beschluss des Zweiten Senats vom 6. Oktober 2020 - 2 BvC 32/19 -, Rn. 10; Beschluss der 2. Kammer des Zweiten Senats vom 23. Oktober 2020 - 2 BvR 341/20 -, Rn. 1).

Von einer Begründung der Nichtannahme der Verfassungsbeschwerde wird nach § 93d Abs. 1 Satz 3 BVerfGG abgesehen.

Diese Entscheidung ist unanfechtbar.