Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VB.2025.00461 • VG ZH VB.2025.00461 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Administrative Court Jurisdiction Over KESB and Family Law Matters

Numero d'incarto VB.2025.00461
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an appeal challenging the jurisdiction of the administrative court to handle a complaint regarding several matters, specifically the initiation of criminal proceedings, orders issued by the Youth and Adult Protection Authority (KESB), spousal protection measures, post-divorce custody and visitation arrangements, and initial protective orders against violence, as well as jurisdiction over the supervisory appeal itself. The court ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to review these specific actions because they fall outside the scope of matters subject to administrative supervision under the relevant cantonal law, leading to the inadmissibility of the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Aufsichtsbeschwerde | Keine Zuständigkeit für Einleitung eines Strafverfahrens (E. 2.1), gegenüber Anordnungen der KESB sowie eheschutzrechtliche Massnahmen oder nacheheliche Sorge- und Besuchsrechtsregelungen (E. 2.2), gegenüber Gewaltschutzmassnahmen in erster Instanz (E. 2.3), für Aufsichtsbeschwerden (E. 2.4). Nichteintreten.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
autorità amministrativa declinatoria di competenza vigilanza dell'autorità competente procedura di protezione degli adulti estensione della protezione denuncia penale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 38b Abs. I lit. a VRG
The court declined jurisdiction regarding the initiation of criminal proceedings based on this provision.
§ 38b Abs. II VRG
The court declined jurisdiction regarding orders of the KESB and family law measures concerning custody and visitation rights.
§ 57 VRG
The court declined jurisdiction concerning protection from violence measures in the first instance based on this provision.
§ 58 VRG
The court declined to rule on the supervisory appeal (Aufsichtsbeschwerde) based on this provision.
§ 1 VRG
This provision is cited concerning the overall scope of the court's jurisdiction which it ultimately declined.
Generato dall'IA
PQ220068
Appellant v. District Council Regarding KESB Actions
PA190027
Jurisdiction Over Procedural KESB Decisions
PA130020
KESB Outpatient Measures Jurisdiction Appeal
PQ130001
Jurisdiction for Provisional Measures in KESB Appeals
LE170010
Marital Protection Court Jurisdiction Over Child Matters Pending KESB Proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 38b Abs. I lit. a VRG

The court declined jurisdiction regarding the initiation of criminal proceedings based on this provision.

§ 38b Abs. II VRG

The court declined jurisdiction regarding orders of the KESB and family law measures concerning custody and visitation rights.

§ 57 VRG

The court declined jurisdiction concerning protection from violence measures in the first instance based on this provision.

§ 58 VRG

The court declined to rule on the supervisory appeal (Aufsichtsbeschwerde) based on this provision.

§ 1 VRG

This provision is cited concerning the overall scope of the court's jurisdiction which it ultimately declined.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2025.00461

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=225167&W10_KEY=13317458&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2025.00461 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 24.07.2025 · Spruchkörper: · 3. Abteilung/Einzelrichter · Weiterzug: · Das Bundesgericht ist auf eine Beschwerde in öffentlich-rechtlichen Angelegenheiten gegen diesen Entscheid am 26.08.2025 nicht eingetreten. · Rechtsgebiet: · Übriges Verwaltungsrecht · Betreff: · Aufsichtsbeschwerde · Keine Zuständigkeit für Einleitung eines Strafverfahrens (E. 2.1), gegenüber Anordnungen der KESB sowie eheschutzrechtliche Massnahmen oder nacheheliche Sorge- und Besuchsrechtsregelungen (E. 2.2), gegenüber Gewaltschutzmassnahmen in erster Instanz (E. 2.3), für Aufsichtsbeschwerden (E. 2.4). Nichteintreten. · --- · Stichworte: · AUFSICHTSBESCHWERDE BESUCHSREGELUNG GEWALTSCHUTZMASSNAHMEN KESB STRAFANZEIGE ZUSTÄNDIGKEIT · Rechtsnormen: · § 1 VRG § 38b Abs. I lit. a VRG § 38b Abs. II VRG § 57 VRG § 58 VRG · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 5