Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Security Deposit Receipt
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe administrative court dismissed an appeal because the required security deposit was not paid within the legally stipulated deadline, leading to a non-entry decision. The court reasoned that while a subsequent deadline extension was granted, the appeal was still time-barred because the subsequent payment, although sent by mail, did not arrive at the court within the extended period; the relevant law stipulates that deadlines are met only upon receipt by the court, and the mere timely dispatch of the payment does not suffice for compliance.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 15 Abs. II lit. a VRG, § 138 ZPO; Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Security Deposit Receipt: The court reasoned that while a subsequent deadline extension was granted, the appeal was still time-barred because the subsequent payment, although sent by mail, did not arrive at the court within the extended period; the relevant law stipulates that deadlines are met only upon receipt by the court, and the mere timely dispatch of the payment does not suffice for compliance.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis provision was used as the legal basis for the court's decision not to enter a ruling due to the failure to meet the deadline for the deposit payment.
This procedural provision was applied regarding the costs imposed in the final order.
Testo completo
Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2025.00113
--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)
[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=224908&W10_KEY=13317003&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)
--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2025.00113 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 29.04.2025 · Spruchkörper: · 2. Abteilung/Einzelrichter · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Ausländerrecht · Betreff: · Fristwahrung bei Kautionszahlung · Nichteintreten infolge nicht fristgemäss geleisteter Kautionszahlung. · --- · Stichworte: · BESCHWERDEVERBESSERUNG FRISTVERSÄUMNIS KAUTION KAUTIONSSÄUMNIS KOSTENVORSCHUSS NACHFRIST POSTALISCHE ZUSTELLUNG PROZESSRECHTSVERHÄLTNIS SENDUNGSVERFOLGUNG ZUSTELLUNGSFIKTION · Rechtsnormen: · § 11 Abs. I VRG § 11 Abs. II VRG § 12 Abs. I VRG § 15 Abs. II lit. a VRG § 15 Abs. II lit. b VRG § 138 ZPO · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4