Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
VB.2025.00113 • VG ZH VB.2025.00113 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Security Deposit Receipt

Numero d'incarto VB.2025.00113
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The administrative court dismissed an appeal because the required security deposit was not paid within the legally stipulated deadline, leading to a non-entry decision. The court reasoned that while a subsequent deadline extension was granted, the appeal was still time-barred because the subsequent payment, although sent by mail, did not arrive at the court within the extended period; the relevant law stipulates that deadlines are met only upon receipt by the court, and the mere timely dispatch of the payment does not suffice for compliance.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 15 Abs. II lit. a VRG, § 138 ZPO; Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Security Deposit Receipt: The court reasoned that while a subsequent deadline extension was granted, the appeal was still time-barred because the subsequent payment, although sent by mail, did not arrive at the court within the extended period; the relevant law stipulates that deadlines are met only upon receipt by the court, and the mere timely dispatch of the payment does not suffice for compliance.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rispetto del termine garanzia di locazione non pagata disdetta tardiva deposito tardivo conformità amministrativa versamento dell'anticipo delle spese

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 15 Abs. II lit. a VRG

This provision was used as the legal basis for the court's decision not to enter a ruling due to the failure to meet the deadline for the deposit payment.

§ 138 ZPO

This procedural provision was applied regarding the costs imposed in the final order.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2025.00113

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=224908&W10_KEY=13317003&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2025.00113 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 29.04.2025 · Spruchkörper: · 2. Abteilung/Einzelrichter · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Ausländerrecht · Betreff: · Fristwahrung bei Kautionszahlung · Nichteintreten infolge nicht fristgemäss geleisteter Kautionszahlung. · --- · Stichworte: · BESCHWERDEVERBESSERUNG FRISTVERSÄUMNIS KAUTION KAUTIONSSÄUMNIS KOSTENVORSCHUSS NACHFRIST POSTALISCHE ZUSTELLUNG PROZESSRECHTSVERHÄLTNIS SENDUNGSVERFOLGUNG ZUSTELLUNGSFIKTION · Rechtsnormen: · § 11 Abs. I VRG § 11 Abs. II VRG § 12 Abs. I VRG § 15 Abs. II lit. a VRG § 15 Abs. II lit. b VRG § 138 ZPO · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4