Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
VB.2024.00262 • VG ZH VB.2024.00262 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Security Deposit in Family Reunification Case

Numero d'incarto VB.2024.00262
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The administrative court dismissed an appeal concerning family reunification with a son because the appellant failed to provide a required security deposit by the deadline, resulting in non-admittance of the appeal. The court reasoned that the legal basis mandates the payment of a security deposit in certain administrative proceedings, and failure to comply with this formal requirement—despite sufficient notification of the deadline—justifies the rejection of the appeal as inadmissible, regardless of the merits of the underlying claim.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 65a Abs. 2 VRG, § 15 Abs. 2 lit. b VRG; Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Security Deposit in Family Reunification Case: The court reasoned that the legal basis mandates the payment of a security deposit in certain administrative proceedings, and failure to comply with this formal requirement—despite sufficient notification of the deadline—justifies the rejection of the appeal as inadmissible, regardless of the merits of the underlying claim.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ricongiungimento familiare garanzia di locazione non pagata ordine di sfratto procedura di affidamento genitoriale abbandono definitivo del procedimento legittimazione a ricorrere Familiennachzug zum Sohn | Nichteintreten infolge Kautionssäumnis.

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 65a Abs. 2 VRG

This provision was cited in relation to the failure to provide security (Kautionssäumnis), leading to the non-admission of the appeal.

§ 15 Abs. 2 lit. b VRG

This provision was cited in the context of the procedural basis for the decision on inadmissibility.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2024.00262

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=224422&W10_KEY=13317008&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2024.00262 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 19.10.2024 · Spruchkörper: · 4. Abteilung/Einzelrichter · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Ausländerrecht · Betreff: · Familiennachzug zum Sohn · Nichteintreten infolge Kautionssäumnis. · --- · Stichworte: · KAUTIONSSÄUMNIS · Rechtsnormen: · § 15 Abs. 2 lit. b VRG § 65a Abs. 2 VRG · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 5