Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Security Deposit in Family Reunification Case
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe administrative court dismissed an appeal concerning family reunification with a son because the appellant failed to provide a required security deposit by the deadline, resulting in non-admittance of the appeal. The court reasoned that the legal basis mandates the payment of a security deposit in certain administrative proceedings, and failure to comply with this formal requirement—despite sufficient notification of the deadline—justifies the rejection of the appeal as inadmissible, regardless of the merits of the underlying claim.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IA§ 65a Abs. 2 VRG, § 15 Abs. 2 lit. b VRG; Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Security Deposit in Family Reunification Case: The court reasoned that the legal basis mandates the payment of a security deposit in certain administrative proceedings, and failure to comply with this formal requirement—despite sufficient notification of the deadline—justifies the rejection of the appeal as inadmissible, regardless of the merits of the underlying claim.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThis provision was cited in relation to the failure to provide security (Kautionssäumnis), leading to the non-admission of the appeal.
This provision was cited in the context of the procedural basis for the decision on inadmissibility.
Testo completo
Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2024.00262
--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)
[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=224422&W10_KEY=13317008&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)
--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2024.00262 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 19.10.2024 · Spruchkörper: · 4. Abteilung/Einzelrichter · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Ausländerrecht · Betreff: · Familiennachzug zum Sohn · Nichteintreten infolge Kautionssäumnis. · --- · Stichworte: · KAUTIONSSÄUMNIS · Rechtsnormen: · § 15 Abs. 2 lit. b VRG § 65a Abs. 2 VRG · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 5