Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VB.2024.00169 • VG ZH VB.2024.00169 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissal for Electronic Monitoring Sentence Execution Lack of Signed Appeal

Numero d'incarto VB.2024.00169
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns a challenge to a lower court's decision regarding the refusal of an appeal concerning the execution of a sentence under Electronic Monitoring. The administrative court upheld the lower court's decision not to enter a judgment on the appeal because the appellant failed to submit a handwritten, signed appeal within the extended deadline granted by the prior instance. The court reasoned that the requirement for an original signature on the appeal document stems from the statutory form requirement stipulated by law, and therefore, the lower court's decision to dismiss the appeal due to this formal deficiency was legally sound.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Strafvollzug mit Electronic Monitoring | Strafvollzug mit Electronic Monitoring. [Nichteintreten auf den Rekurs, nachdem der Beschwerdeführer innert der von der Vorinstanz angesetzten Nachfrist keine handschriftlich unterzeichnete Rekursschrift einreichte.] Das Erfordernis, dass die Rekursschrift zur Gültigkeit über eine Originalunterschrift der rekurrierenden Person verfügen muss, ergibt sich aus der von § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VRG verlangten Schriftform. Der vorinstanzliche Nichteintretensentscheid ist nicht zu beanstanden (E. 2.2). Abweisung.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
braccialetto elettronico difetto di sottoscrizione licenziamento amministrativo firma digitale esecuzione delle pene requisito legale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VRG
Cited as the legal basis requiring a handwritten signature for the appeal to meet the formal requirement of written form.
§ 10 Abs. IV lit. a VRG
This provision is cited in the context of the decision to dismiss the appeal (Abweisung).
§ 10 Abs. V VRG
This provision is cited in the context of the decision to dismiss the appeal (Abweisung).
§ 23 Abs. I VRG
This provision is cited in the context of the decision to dismiss the appeal (Abweisung).
§ 23 Abs. II VRG
This provision is cited in the context of the decision to dismiss the appeal (Abweisung).
§ 138 Abs. III lit. a ZPO CH
This provision is cited in the context of the decision to dismiss the appeal (Abweisung).
Generato dall'IA
RV250005
Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Address Lower Court's Reasoning on Electronic Monitoring
VB.2019.00726
Appeal Regarding Electronic Monitoring Execution of Partially Suspended Sentence
RB220005
Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Electronic Signature and Substantive Merit
VB.2024.00672
Applicant Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Meet Electronic Monitoring Employment Requirement
UV.2022.00211
Appellant's Failure to Provide Handwritten Signature Leads to Appeal Dismissal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VRG

Cited as the legal basis requiring a handwritten signature for the appeal to meet the formal requirement of written form.

§ 10 Abs. IV lit. a VRG

This provision is cited in the context of the decision to dismiss the appeal (Abweisung).

§ 10 Abs. V VRG

This provision is cited in the context of the decision to dismiss the appeal (Abweisung).

§ 23 Abs. I VRG

This provision is cited in the context of the decision to dismiss the appeal (Abweisung).

§ 23 Abs. II VRG

This provision is cited in the context of the decision to dismiss the appeal (Abweisung).

§ 138 Abs. III lit. a ZPO CH

This provision is cited in the context of the decision to dismiss the appeal (Abweisung).

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2024.00169

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=223967&W10_KEY=13317013&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2024.00169 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 15.04.2024 · Spruchkörper: · 3. Abteilung/Einzelrichter · Weiterzug: · Das Bundesgericht ist auf eine Beschwerde in Strafsachen gegen diesen Entscheid am 23.07.2024 nicht eingetreten. · Rechtsgebiet: · Straf- und Massnahmenvollzug · Betreff: · Strafvollzug mit Electronic Monitoring · Strafvollzug mit Electronic Monitoring. [Nichteintreten auf den Rekurs, nachdem der Beschwerdeführer innert der von der Vorinstanz angesetzten Nachfrist keine handschriftlich unterzeichnete Rekursschrift einreichte.] Das Erfordernis, dass die Rekursschrift zur Gültigkeit über eine Originalunterschrift der rekurrierenden Person verfügen muss, ergibt sich aus der von § 22 Abs. 1 Satz 1 VRG verlangten Schriftform.

Der vorinstanzliche Nichteintretensentscheid ist nicht zu beanstanden (E. 2.2). Abweisung. · --- · Stichworte: · AMTLICHE PUBLIKATION ANORDNUNG IM STRAF- UND MASSNAHMENVOLLZUG ORIGINALUNTERSCHRIFT SCHRIFTLICHKEIT ZUSTELLFIKTION · Rechtsnormen: · § 10 Abs. IV lit. a VRG § 10 Abs. V VRG § 22 Abs. I VRG § 23 Abs. I VRG § 23 Abs. II VRG § 138 Abs. III lit. a ZPO CH · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 5