Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VB.2023.00318 • VG ZH VB.2023.00318 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Regarding Building Permit Noise Exception Approval

Numero d'incarto VB.2023.00318
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an appeal against a decision concerning a building permit that required a noise protection exception permit, where a lower court had deemed the initial noise report insufficient. The court permitted the appellant to address the deficiencies with a corrected and updated noise report, utilizing current data, including the city's current noise map and the calculation model recommended by the federal office for road noise. Based on this permissible, updated report from June 2023, the court found no substantial exceedance of the immission limit value, concluding that the building owner had implemented all reasonable structural and design measures, and ultimately determined that the significant public interest in realizing the construction project outweighed the interest in prohibiting the construction, leading to the approval of the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Baubewilligung | Lärmschutzrechtliche Ausnahmebewilligung; neues Gutachten. Im vorinstanzlichen Entscheid erachtete das Baurekursgericht das Lärmgutachten der Beschwerdeführerin als mangelhaft. Es ist zulässig, dass die Beschwerdeführerin dieser Kritik mit einem berichtigten und zugleich aktualisierten Gutachten – basierend auf den aktuellen Grundlagen wie dem aktuellen Lärmbelastungskataster der Stadt Zürich und dem inzwischen vom BAFU beim Vollzug der Lärmschutz-Verordnung bezüglich Strassenlärm empfohlenen Berechnungsmodell "sonRoad18" – begegnet (E. 3). Wird vorliegend – zulässigerweise – auf das Gutachten vom 5. Juni 2023 abgestellt, liegt keine wesentliche Überschreitung der IGW vor (E. 5.3). Die Bauherrschaft hat mit der gewählten Setzung des Gebäudes, der Gebäudeform, dem Laubengang und der Anordnung der Wohnungen alle verhältnismässigen baulichen und gestalterischen Massnahmen im Sinn von Art. 31 Abs. 1 LSV ergriffen (E. 6.3). Das – gewichtige – öffentliche Interesse an der Verwirklichung des Bauvorhabens überwiegt jenes am Bauverbot (E. 7.3). Gutheissung.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
licenza di costruzione regolamenti di attuazione catasto dei rumori motivi di pubblico interesse esame delle candidature edificio pubblico

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 31 Abs. 1 LSV
The court found that the building owners took all reasonable structural and design measures in the sense of this article.
Art. 31 Abs. 2 LSV
This provision is listed among the regulations relevant to the decision, implying its consideration, although its direct application in the operative part is not explicitly detailed for the main ground.
Art. 39 Abs. 1 LSV
This provision is listed among the regulations relevant to the decision, implying its consideration, although its direct application in the operative part is not explicitly detailed for the main ground.
Art. 41 Abs. 3 LSV
This provision is listed among the regulations relevant to the decision, implying its consideration, although its direct application in the operative part is not explicitly detailed for the main ground.
Art. 22 Abs. 1 USG
This provision is listed among the regulations relevant to the decision, implying its consideration, although its direct application in the operative part is not explicitly detailed for the main ground.
Art. 22 Abs. 2 USG
This provision is listed among the regulations relevant to the decision, implying its consideration, although its direct application in the operative part is not explicitly detailed for the main ground.
§ 52 Abs. 2 VRG
This provision is listed among the regulations relevant to the decision, implying its consideration, although its direct application in the operative part is not explicitly detailed for the main ground.
Generato dall'IA
VB.2021.00162
Appeal Regarding Exception to Noise Protection Regulations for Building Permit
VB.2019.00394
Appeal Against Building Permit Granted with Noise Protection Exemption
VB.2020.00677
Administrative Court Upholds Appeal Against Building Permit Due to Unremediable Noise Exceedance
VB.2021.00164
Appeal Against Denial of Building Permit Due to Excessive Noise Levels Exceeding Immission Limits
VB.2018.00575
Appeal Against Building Permit Decision Regarding Protected Object Classification and Noise Emissions

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 31 Abs. 1 LSV

The court found that the building owners took all reasonable structural and design measures in the sense of this article.

Art. 31 Abs. 2 LSV

This provision is listed among the regulations relevant to the decision, implying its consideration, although its direct application in the operative part is not explicitly detailed for the main ground.

Art. 39 Abs. 1 LSV

This provision is listed among the regulations relevant to the decision, implying its consideration, although its direct application in the operative part is not explicitly detailed for the main ground.

Art. 41 Abs. 3 LSV

This provision is listed among the regulations relevant to the decision, implying its consideration, although its direct application in the operative part is not explicitly detailed for the main ground.

Art. 22 Abs. 1 USG

This provision is listed among the regulations relevant to the decision, implying its consideration, although its direct application in the operative part is not explicitly detailed for the main ground.

Art. 22 Abs. 2 USG

This provision is listed among the regulations relevant to the decision, implying its consideration, although its direct application in the operative part is not explicitly detailed for the main ground.

§ 52 Abs. 2 VRG

This provision is listed among the regulations relevant to the decision, implying its consideration, although its direct application in the operative part is not explicitly detailed for the main ground.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2023.00318

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=224181&W10_KEY=13317011&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2023.00318 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 11.07.2024 · Spruchkörper: · 1. Abteilung/1. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Raumplanungs-, Bau- und Umweltrecht · Betreff: · Baubewilligung · Lärmschutzrechtliche Ausnahmebewilligung; neues Gutachten. Im vorinstanzlichen Entscheid erachtete das Baurekursgericht das Lärmgutachten der Beschwerdeführerin als mangelhaft. Es ist zulässig, dass die Beschwerdeführerin dieser Kritik mit einem berichtigten und zugleich aktualisierten Gutachten – basierend auf den aktuellen Grundlagen wie dem aktuellen Lärmbelastungskataster der Stadt Zürich und dem inzwischen vom BAFU beim Vollzug der Lärmschutz-Verordnung bezüglich Strassenlärm empfohlenen Berechnungsmodell "sonRoad18" – begegnet (E. 3).

Wird vorliegend – zulässigerweise – auf das Gutachten vom 5. Juni 2023 abgestellt, liegt keine wesentliche Überschreitung der IGW vor (E. 5.3). Die Bauherrschaft hat mit der gewählten Setzung des Gebäudes, der Gebäudeform, dem Laubengang und der Anordnung der Wohnungen alle verhältnismässigen baulichen und gestalterischen Massnahmen im Sinn von Art. 31 Abs. 1 LSV ergriffen (E. 6.3). Das – gewichtige – öffentliche Interesse an der Verwirklichung des Bauvorhabens überwiegt jenes am Bauverbot (E. 7.3). Gutheissung. · --- · Stichworte:

· GUTACHTEN INTERESSENABWÄGUNG LÄRMSCHUTZ LÄRMSCHUTZMASSNAHMEN WESENTLICHE ÜBERSCHREITUNG · Rechtsnormen: · Art. 31 Abs. 1 LSV Art. 31 Abs. 2 LSV Art. 39 Abs. 1 LSV Art. 41 Abs. 3 LSV Art. 22 Abs. 1 USG Art. 22 Abs. 2 USG § 52 Abs. 2 VRG · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 3