Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VB.2023.00020 • VG ZH VB.2023.00020 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Process Cost Advance in Residence Permit Case

Numero d'incarto VB.2023.00020
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The administrative court dismissed an appeal against the non-renewal of an EU/EFTA residence permit because the appellant failed to pay the required security deposit (process cost advance) by the stipulated deadline. The court determined that, aside from the procedural failure, the substantive appeal against the permit non-renewal would likely have been rejected anyway, thus upholding the lower decision by refusing to enter a judgment on the merits due to the missed payment deadline.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Nichtverlängerung der Aufenthaltsbewilligung EU/EFTA | Kautionssäumnis. Auf die Beschwerde ist androhungsgemäss nicht einzutreten, nachdem der auferlegte Prozesskostenvorschuss nicht fristgerecht geleistet wurde (E. 1.1 und 1.2). Überdies wäre die Beschwerde auch bei materieller Beurteilung aller Vorausicht nach abzuweisen gewesen (E. 1.3). Ausgangsgemässe Regelung der Kosten- und Entschädigungsfolgen sowie Rechtsmittelbelehrung (E. 2 und 3). Nichteintreten.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
rinnovo del permesso di dimora anticipo delle spese permesso di dimora versamento dell'anticipo delle spese anticipo termine processuale perentorio

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 30 Abs. I lit. b AIG
Although the appeal was not entered into substantively, this provision represents the main legal area relevant to the underlying issue (Non-renewal of residence permit EU/EFTA).
Art. 50 AIG
Although the appeal was not entered into substantively, this provision represents the main legal area relevant to the underlying issue (Non-renewal of residence permit EU/EFTA).
Art. 23 Abs. I VFP
Although the appeal was not entered into substantively, this provision represents the main legal area relevant to the underlying issue (Non-renewal of residence permit EU/EFTA).
§ 15 Abs. II lit. b VRG
This provision governs the procedural consequence (non-entry into the appeal) due to failure to pay the advance on procedural costs.
Generato dall'IA
VB.2020.00560
Residence Permit Appeal Dismissed for Non-Payment of Costs
VB.2021.00758
Residence Permit Appeal Dismissed for Late Security Deposit
VB.2016.00334
Late Appeal Dismissed: Residence Permit Case
VB.2020.00885
Late Appeal Dismissed in Residence Permit Revocation Case
VB.2019.00587
Dismissal of Residence Permit Appeal Due to Unpaid Security Deposit After Legal Aid Rejection

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 30 Abs. I lit. b AIG

Although the appeal was not entered into substantively, this provision represents the main legal area relevant to the underlying issue (Non-renewal of residence permit EU/EFTA).

Art. 50 AIG

Although the appeal was not entered into substantively, this provision represents the main legal area relevant to the underlying issue (Non-renewal of residence permit EU/EFTA).

Art. 23 Abs. I VFP

Although the appeal was not entered into substantively, this provision represents the main legal area relevant to the underlying issue (Non-renewal of residence permit EU/EFTA).

§ 15 Abs. II lit. b VRG

This provision governs the procedural consequence (non-entry into the appeal) due to failure to pay the advance on procedural costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VB.2023.00020

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=223033&W10_KEY=13317022&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VB.2023.00020 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 21.02.2023 · Spruchkörper: · 2. Abteilung/Einzelrichter · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Ausländerrecht · Betreff: · Nichtverlängerung der Aufenthaltsbewilligung EU/EFTA · Kautionssäumnis. Auf die Beschwerde ist androhungsgemäss nicht einzutreten, nachdem der auferlegte Prozesskostenvorschuss nicht fristgerecht geleistet wurde (E. 1.1 und 1.2). Überdies wäre die Beschwerde auch bei materieller Beurteilung aller Vorausicht nach abzuweisen gewesen (E. 1.3). Ausgangsgemässe Regelung der Kosten- und Entschädigungsfolgen sowie Rechtsmittelbelehrung (E. 2 und 3). Nichteintreten. · --- · Stichworte: · KAUTIONSSÄUMNIS NICHTEINTRETEN NICHTEINTRETENSENTSCHEID PROZESSKOSTENVORSCHUSS · Rechtsnormen: · Art. 30 Abs. I lit. b AIG Art. 50 AIG Art. 23 Abs. I VFP § 15 Abs. II lit. b VRG · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4