Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
STK 2022 24 • KG SZ STK 2022 24 Generato dall'IA

Public Prosecutor v. Accused (Breach of Trust Appeals)

Numero d'incarto STK 2022 24
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court reviewed appeals against a lower court's judgment concerning multiple counts of breach of trust, initiated by the accused, the public prosecutor's office, and several private parties who were either appellants or respondents in the subsequent proceedings. The court addressed the complex matter involving numerous parties and the central criminal charge, ultimately rendering a decision based on its interpretation of the evidence and relevant law pertaining to the alleged disloyal management of affairs.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO, Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 68 Abs. 2 StPO; Public Prosecutor v. Accused (Breach of Trust Appeals): The court addressed the complex matter involving numerous parties and the central criminal charge, ultimately rendering a decision based on its interpretation of the evidence and relevant law pertaining to the alleged disloyal management of affairs.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
interpretazione della sentenza accusa penale trust esame delle censure formali ricusazione di pubblici ministeri legittimazione a ricorrere mehrfache ungetreue Geschäftsbesorgung | Strafgesetzbuch

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO
Used to reject the appeal filed by the accused A. concerning the criminal conviction.
Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO
Used to reject the appeal filed by the private claimant F. regarding the acquittal of the accused.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO
Used to order the state to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings for the accused A.
Art. 68 Abs. 2 StPO
Used to order the private claimants D. and F. to pay the costs of their rejected appeals.
Generato dall'IA
STK 2022 26
Appeals Regarding Breach of Trust Convictions and Sentencing
STK 2022 49
Public Prosecutor v. Individual (Criminal Appeal on Mismanagement and Fraud Charges)
BEK 2018 90
Prosecutor's Discretion Upheld in Breach of Trust Dismissal Appeal
STK 2021 44
Public Prosecutor v. Defendant (Embezzlement and Forgery Appeal)
STK 2022 71
Prosecutor v. Accused: Appeal of Criminal Convictions and Sentencing

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO

Used to reject the appeal filed by the accused A. concerning the criminal conviction.

Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO

Used to reject the appeal filed by the private claimant D. regarding the acquittal of the accused.

Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO

Used to reject the appeal filed by the private claimant F. regarding the acquittal of the accused.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 StPO

Used to order the state to pay the costs of the appeal proceedings for the accused A.

Art. 68 Abs. 2 StPO

Used to order the private claimants D. and F. to pay the costs of their rejected appeals.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Urteil vom 16. Juni 2023 \n STK 2022 24 und STK 2022 25 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Prof. Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter lic. iur. Walter Züger, Reto Fedrizzi, Bettina Krienbühl und Clara Betschart, Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Alen Draganovic. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Berufungsführer sowie Berufungsgegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 3. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin sowie Berufungsführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin E.________, 3. F.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner sowie Berufungsführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin E.________, 4. G.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, 5. H.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, 6. I.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, 7. J.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, 8. K.________, Privatkläger und Berufungsgegner, 9. L.________, Privatklägerin und Berufungsgegnerin, |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n mehrfache ungetreue Geschäftsbesorgung |\n \n\n

\n (Berufungen gegen das Urteil des Strafgerichts Schwyz vom 19. Februar 2022, SGO 2021 22);- \n \n \n \n hat die Strafkammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben: