Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
I 2019 20 • VG SZ I 2019 20 Generato dall'IA

Accident Insurance Bodily Injury Appeal

Numero d'incarto I 2019 20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal against a decision related to accident insurance regarding bodily injury, where the appellants challenged the prior ruling. The court reached its verdict based on an analysis of the evidence presented to determine the validity and scope of the claimed accident and resulting bodily harm under the relevant insurance regulations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 65 Abs. 2 BV, Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG, Art. 68 Abs. 5 BGG; Accident Insurance Bodily Injury Appeal: The court reached its verdict based on an analysis of the evidence presented to determine the validity and scope of the claimed accident and resulting bodily harm under the relevant insurance regulations.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto di essere sentito lesioni personali regolamento dell'assicurazione lesione corporale dovuta a infortunio domanda di prestazione d'assicurazione organo dell'assicurazione contro gli infortuni

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 2 BV
The court dismissed the appeal because the constitutional right to be heard (Art. 65 Abs. 2 BV) was not violated.
Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG
The court dismissed the appeal as inadmissible because it was directed against a final decision.
Art. 68 Abs. 5 BGG
The court ruled that the State does not bear the costs of the federal appeal.
Generato dall'IA
I 2021 56
Accident Insurance Causation Appeal
I 2019 11
Appeal Regarding Causation in Accident Insurance Claim
I 2021 78
Accident Insurance Causation Dispute
I 2022 37
Accident Insurance Benefit Refusal and Recovery Appeal
I 2020 20
Insurance Coverage for Accident-Like Bodily Harm

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 2 BV

The court dismissed the appeal because the constitutional right to be heard (Art. 65 Abs. 2 BV) was not violated.

Art. 93 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

The court dismissed the appeal as inadmissible because it was directed against a final decision.

Art. 68 Abs. 5 BGG

The court ruled that the State does not bear the costs of the federal appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2019 20 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. August 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n \n \n1. A.________, \n2. B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Unfallversicherung (Unfall; Körperschädigung