Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2024 17 • KG SZ BEK 2024 17 Generato dall'IA

Plaintiff v. Prosecutor (Stay of Proceedings Appeal)

Numero d'incarto BEK 2024 17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a private plaintiff appealing a prosecutor's decision to stay criminal proceedings against an unknown perpetrator. The court, acting as the Cantonal Court President, reviewed the appeal against the prosecutor's decision, which effectively halted the criminal investigation, and reached a determination regarding the propriety of that stay.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 372 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Plaintiff v. Prosecutor (Stay of Proceedings Appeal): The court, acting as the Cantonal Court President, reviewed the appeal against the prosecutor's decision, which effectively halted the criminal investigation, and reached a determination regarding the propriety of that stay.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
sospensione del procedimento competenza del pubblico ministero inchiesta penale decisione incidentale impugnabile interesse ad agire domanda di ricusazione Sistierung | Untersuchungsführung

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 372 Abs. 1 StPO
Used as the legal basis to dismiss the appeal since the contested decision did not cause irreparable harm.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs because his appeal was dismissed.
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2020 27
Private Victim Challenge to Prosecutor's Decision to Stay Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2020 59
Plaintiff v. Prosecutor (Discontinuance of Proceedings Appeal)
BEK 2023 47
Plaintiff v. Prosecutor on Refusal to Prosecute
BEK 2021 200
Plaintiff v. Prosecutor Regarding Termination of Criminal Proceedings
BEK 2020 89
Appeal Against Stay of Criminal Proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 372 Abs. 1 StPO

Used as the legal basis to dismiss the appeal since the contested decision did not cause irreparable harm.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The appellant is ordered to pay the court costs because his appeal was dismissed.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 22. Februar 2024 \n BEK 2024 17 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Reto Heizmann, Gerichtsschreiberin Julia Lüönd. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft, 3. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin B.________, 2. unbekannte Täterschaft, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin, |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Sistierung |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 3. Januar 2024, SU 2022 4683);- \n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: