Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
BEK 2022 22 • KG SZ BEK 2022 22 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Commence Criminal Proceedings

Numero d'incarto BEK 2022 22
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The private plaintiffs appealed a prosecutor's decision of non-commencement of criminal proceedings regarding an incident, seeking to overturn the decision not to pursue the case against the accused. The court upheld the prosecutor's decision, reasoning that the factual basis presented by the plaintiffs in the complaint and subsequent appeal did not sufficiently establish the elements of the alleged criminal offense to warrant initiating a formal investigation or prosecution, thereby affirming the initial determination that there was no sufficient ground to proceed.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 355 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO, Art. 430 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO; Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Commence Criminal Proceedings: The court upheld the prosecutor's decision, reasoning that the factual basis presented by the plaintiffs in the complaint and subsequent appeal did not sufficiently establish the elements of the alleged criminal offense to warrant initiating a formal investigation or prosecution, thereby affirming the initial determination that there was no sufficient ground to proceed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
azione penale ritardo del ministero pubblico impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio motivazione di fatto interesse ad agire sospensione del procedimento Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren | Staatsanwaltschaft

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 355 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO

The appeal is dismissed based on this provision, as the decision being challenged is not appealable.

Art. 430 Abs. 1 StPO

The appeal is dismissed because the decision is not appealable, and the appeal procedure is terminated.

Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

The procedural costs are determined according to this article.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Beschluss vom 13. Oktober 2022 \n BEK 2022 22 \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident lic. iur. Stefan Weber, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, Gerichtsschreiber MLaw Patrick Neidhart. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, 2. B.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin C.________, gegen 1. D.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin E.________, 2. Staatsanwaltschaft, 2. Abteilung, \n Postfach 1201, Schmiedgasse 21, 6431 Schwyz, |\n

\n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Nichtanhandnahmeverfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft vom 10. Februar 2022, SU 2021 10822);- \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: