Prosecutor's Seizure of Tractor Upheld on Theft Grounds
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case concerns an appeal against a prosecutor's order to seize a tractor, where the accused challenged the seizure. The appellate court upheld the seizure order, reasoning that there was a sufficient initial suspicion that the tractor was related to the criminal proceedings, specifically regarding a charge of theft, thus justifying the continued retention of the seized property as evidence pending further investigation or judicial resolution.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 360 Abs. 2 StPO, Art. 393 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO; Prosecutor's Seizure of Tractor Upheld on Theft Grounds: The appellate court upheld the seizure order, reasoning that there was a sufficient initial suspicion that the tractor was related to the criminal proceedings, specifically regarding a charge of theft, thus justifying the continued retention of the seized property as evidence pending further investigation or judicial resolution.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe court ordered the appeal to be rejected based on this provision.
The court applied this provision regarding the subject matter of the appeal (seizure).
The court ordered the costs of the appeal to be borne by the appellant.
Testo completo
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n \n Beschluss vom 27. September 2021 \n BEK 2021 10 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Célestine Rupp. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdeführer, vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 4. Abteilung, Postfach 128, Bahnhofstrasse 4, 8832 Wollerau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Beschlagnahme eines Traktors |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen den Beschlagnahmebefehl der Staatsanwaltschaft des Kantons Schwyz vom 29. Januar 2021, SU 2020 1490);-
\n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: