Appeal of Denial of Free Legal Aid in Criminal Prosecution
Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAA private litigant, acting as the complainant, appealed a youth prosecutor's decision denying the request for free legal aid concerning criminal prosecution proceedings. The court reasoned that the appellate review of a denial of free legal aid is limited to the factual basis presented at the time of the lower court's decision, and since the appellant failed to timely provide sufficient documentation demonstrating current financial inability to cover the costs, the initial denial, which relied on the existing financial assessment, was upheld.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 68 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO; Appeal of Denial of Free Legal Aid in Criminal Prosecution: The court reasoned that the appellate review of a denial of free legal aid is limited to the factual basis presented at the time of the lower court's decision, and since the appellant failed to timely provide sufficient documentation demonstrating current financial inability to cover the costs, the initial denial, which relied on the existing financial assessment, was upheld.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe court used this provision to grant the appellant free legal aid for the appeal proceedings.
The court used this provision to decide on the costs of the appeal proceedings, namely by ordering the state to bear the costs.
Testo completo
\n
\n
\n
\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n
\n \n \n \n \n
\n \n Beschluss vom 15. Februar 2021 \n BEK 2020 170 \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichterinnen Clara Betschart und lic. iur. Ilaria Beringer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin MLaw Gloria Guggenberger. |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n \n
\n\n| | |
|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen Staatsanwaltschaft, 5. Abteilung, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, Postfach 75, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch C.________, |\n
\n\n
\n \n \n
\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n unentgeltliche Rechtspflege |\n \n\n
\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Jugendanwaltschaft des Kantons Schwyz vom 16. Oktober 2020, SUJ 2020 331);- \n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: