Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 185 • KG SZ BEK 2018 185 Generato dall'IA

Appeal against Denial of Private Prosecutor Status Lacking Direct Injury

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 185
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A party who filed a criminal complaint sought to be admitted as a private prosecutor against the defendants in ongoing proceedings following a decision by the Public Prosecutor's Office to dismiss the case, which decision the party was appealing. The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that for a party to be admitted as a private prosecutor in criminal proceedings, they must demonstrate that they have suffered a direct and personal legal disadvantage as a result of the alleged offense, and since the appealing party had not established such a specific injury directly connected to the acts prosecuted, the right to join as a private prosecutor was correctly denied by the lower authority.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 68 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 432 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 64 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal against Denial of Private Prosecutor Status Lacking Direct Injury: The court dismissed the appeal, reasoning that for a party to be admitted as a private prosecutor in criminal proceedings, they must demonstrate that they have suffered a direct and personal legal disadvantage as a result of the alleged offense, and since the appealing party had not established such a specific injury directly connected to the acts prosecuted, the right to join as a private prosecutor was correctly denied by the lower authority.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
denuncia penale difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico statuto giuridico azione penale privata diritto di manifestare legittimazione a ricorrere

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 68 Abs. 1 StPO
The court dismissed the appeal by confirming the decision not to admit the appellant as a private prosecutor.
Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO
The court rejected the appeal against the decision not to admit the appellant as a private prosecutor.
Art. 432 Abs. 1 StPO
The court ruled on the costs of the appeal proceedings.
Art. 64 BGG
The court rejected the request for legal aid for the appeal proceedings.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The court ordered the appellant to pay the judicial costs.
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 132
Appellant v. Accused (Private Prosecutor Status Appeal)
BEK 2024 131
Appeal of Private Complainant Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Prosecute
BEK 2023 149
Private Complainant Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Prosecute
BEK 2023 85
Complainant Appeal of Prosecutor's Refusal to Initiate Proceedings Upheld
BEK 2022 183
Appeal of Prosecutor's Decision Not to Initiate Criminal Proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 68 Abs. 1 StPO

The court dismissed the appeal by confirming the decision not to admit the appellant as a private prosecutor.

Art. 426 Abs. 1 StPO

The court rejected the appeal against the decision not to admit the appellant as a private prosecutor.

Art. 432 Abs. 1 StPO

The court ruled on the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Art. 64 BGG

The court rejected the request for legal aid for the appeal proceedings.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the judicial costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n Beschluss vom 4. April 2019 \n BEK 2018 185 \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtsvizepräsident Dr. Reto Heizmann, Kantonsrichter Clara Betschart und Josef Reichlin, Gerichtsschreiber lic. iur. Mathis Bösch. |\n

\n\n

\n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n A.________, Strafanzeigeerstatterin und Beschwerdeführerin, vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin B.________, gegen 1. Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln, Postfach 128, 8832 Wollerau, Anklagebehörde und Berufungsgegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwalt C.________, 2. D.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 3. E.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin, beide Beschuldigten erbeten verteidigt durch Rechtsanwalt F.________ |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n

\n\n| | | |\n betreffend |\n Nichtzulassung als Privatklägerin |\n \n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Verfügung der Staatsanwaltschaft Höfe Einsiedeln vom 19. November 2018, SUH 2017 1683 und 1684);-

\n \n \n \n hat die Beschwerdekammer, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: