Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
BEK 2018 11 • KG SZ BEK 2018 11 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Against Non-Prosecution Decision for Abuse of Office and Other Offenses

Numero d'incarto BEK 2018 11
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Svitto (CH-SZ)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A group of private claimants appealed a cantonal public prosecutor's decision not to prosecute several individuals for alleged offenses including abuse of office, breach of trust, forgery, obtaining a false certification, and racial discrimination. The court addressed the appeal against the decision of non-commencement of proceedings, ultimately upholding the prosecutor's decision by reasoning that the factual basis presented did not meet the requisite threshold for criminal prosecution concerning the specified offenses.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch, ungetreue Amtsführung, Urkundenfälschung, Erschleichen einer falschen Beurkundung, Rassendiskriminierung) | Nichtanhandnahme Strafverfahren

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
azione penale base fattuale procedimento per falsità abuso d'autorità vertenza non amministrativa imputabilità ad una persona giuridica di diritto pubblico

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 360 Abs. 2 StPO
The court declared the appeal inadmissible based on this provision.
Art. 423 Abs. 1 StPO
The court ruled on the costs of the proceedings, citing this article.
Generato dall'IA
BEK 2018 6
Appeal Against Dismissal of Criminal Proceedings for Abuse of Office and Other Charges
BEK 2018 17
Private Complainants v. Public Prosecutor (Dismissal of Abuse of Office Charges)
BEK 2018 16
Plaintiffs v. Public Prosecutor's Office (Abuse of Office and Discrimination Allegations)
BEK 2019 72
Complainant v. Cantonal Prosecutor's Office (Criminal Proceedings Dismissal Appeal)
BEK 2018 136
Appeal Against Non-Prosecution for Data Misuse and Official Secrecy

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 360 Abs. 2 StPO

The court declared the appeal inadmissible based on this provision.

Art. 423 Abs. 1 StPO

The court ruled on the costs of the proceedings, citing this article.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

\n

\n

\n\n| | | |\n Kantonsgericht Schwyz |\n 1 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n \n Verfügung vom 16. Februar 2018 \n BEK 2018 11 \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Mitwirkend |\n Kantonsgerichtspräsident Dr. Urs Tschümperlin. |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n In Sachen |\n 1. A.________, Privatkläger und Beschwerdeführer, 2. B.________, Beschwerdeführerin, 3. C.________, neu firmierend: D.________, Privatklägerin und Beschwerdeführerin, gegen 1. Kantonale Staatsanwaltschaft, Postfach 75, Sicherheitsstützpunkt Biberbrugg, 8836 Bennau, Strafverfolgungsbehörde und Beschwerdegegnerin, vertreten durch Staatsanwältin E.________, 2. F.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin, 3. G.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 4. H.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 5. I.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, 6. J.________, Beschuldigte und Beschwerdegegnerin 7. K.________, Beschuldigter und Beschwerdegegner, |\n

\n|\n |\n |\n

\n|\n betreffend |\n Nichtanhandnahme (Amtsmissbrauch, ungetreue Amtsführung, Urkundenfälschung, Erschleichen einer falschen Beurkundung, Rassendiskriminierung) |\n

\n\n

\n (Beschwerde gegen die Nichtanhandnahmeverfügung der kantonalen Staatsanwaltschaft vom 3. Januar 2018, SUB 2017 21, 22, 23, 24, 342 und 377);-

\n \n \n \n hat der Kantonsgerichtspräsident, \n \n nachdem sich ergeben und in Erwägung: