Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
SK 09 109 • KG LU SK 09 109 Generato dall'IA

Pfandausfallschein vs. Verlustschein: Execution Proceedings Distinction

Numero d'incarto SK 09 109
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court confirmed that a certificate of default for a security interest (Pfandausfallschein) is distinct from a certificate of loss (Verlustschein), meaning a subsequent execution based on the certificate of default constitutes a new collection proceeding, not a continuation of the secured debt collection process. Therefore, if this new proceeding results in a certificate of loss, the creditor is entitled under relevant articles to request the continuation of the execution, rejecting the debtor's appeal which wrongly presumed the certificate of default was equivalent to a certificate of loss or that the subsequent execution was a mere continuation barred by prior rulings.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 158 Abs. 1 und Abs. 2 Satz 2 SchKG. Der Pfandausfallschein ist kein Verlustschein. Die an die Ausstellung eines Pfandausfallscheins anschliessende Betreibung ist kein Fortsetzungsverfahren im Sinn von Art. 149 Abs. 3 SchKG, sondern eine neue Betreibung. Resultiert daraus ein Verlustschein, ist der Gläubiger daher berechtigt, unter Berufung auf Art. 149 Abs. 3 SchKG die Fortsetzung der Betreibung zu verlangen. | Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
interessi di mora utile attestato di carenza beni mora offesa al credito responsabilità per debiti ereditari

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 149 Abs. 3 SchKG
This provision is cited in the 'Entscheid' section as the legal basis the creditor used to demand the continuation of the enforcement proceedings after a subsequent loss certificate was issued.
Art. 158 Abs. 2 Satz
Leitsatz: · Art. 158 Abs.
Art. 17 SchKG
Art. 158 Abs. 1 SchKG
This provision is cited in the 'Entscheid' section, defining the context of the Pfandausfallschein (collateral deficiency certificate).
Art. 149 Abs. 1 SchKG
Die an die Ausstellung eines Pfandausfallscheins anschliessende Betreibung ist kein Fortsetzungsverfahren im Sinn von Art. 149 Abs.
Art. 158 Abs. 2 SchKG
Leitsatz: · Art. 158 Abs.
Art. 158 SchKG
Leitsatz: · Art. 158 Abs.
Art. 41 Abs. 1bis SchKG
Generato dall'IA
OG 1994 49
Creditor Enforcement Rights Following Pfändungsverlustschein After Bankruptcy
SK 02 155
Execution Loss Certificates and Post-Bankruptcy Provisional Legal Remedy Status
SK 00 95
Debtor's Objection to Provisional Execution Based on Allegedly Defective Service of Payment Order
SK 03 146
Appeal on Improper Summons in Foreign Judgment Affecting Execution Authorization
OG 1991 58
Objection to Claim Versus Security Interest in Forced Realization Proceedings

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 158 Abs. 1 SchKG

This provision is cited in the 'Entscheid' section, defining the context of the Pfandausfallschein (collateral deficiency certificate).

Art. 158 Abs. 2 Satz 2 SchKG

This provision is cited in the 'Entscheid' section as the basis for the creditor requesting seizure following the collateral deficiency certificate.

Art. 149 Abs. 3 SchKG

This provision is cited in the 'Entscheid' section as the legal basis the creditor used to demand the continuation of the enforcement proceedings after a subsequent loss certificate was issued.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkurskommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 03.02.2010

Fallnummer: · SK 09 109

LGVE: · 2010 I Nr. 37

Leitsatz: · Art. 158 Abs. 1 und Abs. 2 Satz 2 SchKG. Der Pfandausfallschein ist kein Verlustschein. Die an die Ausstellung eines Pfandausfallscheins anschliessende Betreibung ist kein Fortsetzungsverfahren im Sinn von Art. 149 Abs. 3 SchKG, sondern eine neue Betreibung. Resultiert daraus ein Verlustschein, ist der Gläubiger daher berechtigt, unter Berufung auf Art. 149 Abs. 3 SchKG die Fortsetzung der Betreibung zu verlangen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.