Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
SK 05 112 • KG LU SK 05 112 Generato dall'IA

Real Security Enforcement Validity Despite Omission of Third-Party Owner Service

Numero d'incarto SK 05 112
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In enforcement proceedings based on the realization of a real security right (grundpfandverwertung), the failure to serve the payment order to a third-party owner of the pledged property is not a ground for nullity of the enforcement action itself. The court reasoned that while a third-party owner, such as a co-owner, must be served the payment order to allow them to raise objections and halt the realization procedure until their rights are addressed, the lack of prior service only suspends the subsequent enforcement steps against the third party, leaving the proceedings validly initiated against the primary debtor.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

Art. 22 und 153 Abs. 2 SchKG. In der Betreibung auf Grundpfandverwertung ist die fehlende Zustellung des Zahlungsbefehls an den Dritteigentümer kein Nichtigkeitsgrund. | Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
pagamento in mano di terzi validità della notificazione esecuzione sostanza immobiliare titolo esecutivo di rigetto obbligazione reale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 153 Abs. 2 SchKG
Cited in the decision's ruling section as the basis for rejecting the claim that lack of service to the third owner nullifies the debt enforcement proceedings.
Art. 153 SchKG
Art. 100 VZG
Art. 22 SchKG
Cited in the decision's ruling section regarding the applicable law.
Generato dall'IA
OG 1991 56
Mortgage Enforcement Against Debtor for Third-Party Owned Collateral
SK 99 72
Creditor Enforcement Against Family Home and Spouse's Co-Debtor Status
SK 00 95
Debtor's Objection to Provisional Execution Based on Allegedly Defective Service of Payment Order
SK 04 87
Enforcement Proceeding: Debt Offset and Partnership Proof
OG 1995 31
Creditor Enforcement Actions as Basis for Security for Costs

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 22 SchKG

Cited in the decision's ruling section regarding the applicable law.

Art. 153 Abs. 2 SchKG

Cited in the decision's ruling section as the basis for rejecting the claim that lack of service to the third owner nullifies the debt enforcement proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkurskommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 02.11.2005

Fallnummer: · SK 05 112

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 46

Leitsatz: · Art. 22 und 153 Abs. 2 SchKG. In der Betreibung auf Grundpfandverwertung ist die fehlende Zustellung des Zahlungsbefehls an den Dritteigentümer kein Nichtigkeitsgrund.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.