Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
KA 04 83 • KG LU KA 04 83 Generato dall'IA

Sexual Harassment Case: Reversal of Court Cost Assessment Based on Conduct Deviation

Numero d'incarto KA 04 83
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In a case where criminal proceedings were terminated after the complainants withdrew their criminal complaint for sexual harassment, the lower authority had improperly charged the defendant with the official court costs based solely on the finding that the defendant's conduct significantly deviated from that of an average person, characterizing the conduct as "peeping" for which the defendant had apologized. The higher court overturned this cost assessment, reasoning that charging a defendant with costs despite acquittal or termination under the relevant statute requires specifying a clear violation of a written or unwritten norm for which the defendant is civilly blameworthy, and merely stating a deviation from average conduct without identifying the violated norm is insufficient to justify shifting the burden of official costs.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

§ 277 Abs. 1 StPO. Die blosse Feststellung, dass das Verhalten der angeschuldigten Person erheblich von jenem eines Durchschnittsmenschen abweiche, ohne die angeblich verletzte Norm zu bezeichnen, genügt nicht, um ihr (amtliche) Verfahrenskosten zu überbinden. | Strafprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
molestia sessuale reato penale tassazione delle spese stralcio del procedimento spese di detenzione anticipo delle spese

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 41 OR
Art. 198 StGB
Art. 28 ZGB
§ 277 Abs. 1 StPO
This provision was the main legal basis cited in the final orders regarding the imposition of court costs despite the case being dropped.
§ 276 Abs. 1 StPO
Cited to establish the general rule that costs are borne by the State when the accused is acquitted or the proceedings are discontinued, unless exceptions apply.
§ 278 Abs. 1 StPO
Cited to establish the general rule that costs are borne by the private plaintiff if the facts warrant it, as an alternative to the accused bearing them.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
BGE 116 Ia 162
SFA: Imposition of Costs on Acquitted Accused for Ethically Reprehensible Conduct
BGE 120 Ia 147
Forensic Record Retention After Case Discontinuation
Generato dall'IA
2N 11 60
Cost Allocation Upon Discontinuation or Acquittal
OG 1992 71
Costs Shifting in Discontinued or Acquitted Criminal Proceedings
KA 02 159
Complainant Withdrawal and Defense Costs in Minor Offense Case
21 05 210
Acquittal Costs in Simple Regulatory Offense Case

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 277 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision was the main legal basis cited in the final orders regarding the imposition of court costs despite the case being dropped.

§ 276 Abs. 1 StPO

Cited to establish the general rule that costs are borne by the State when the accused is acquitted or the proceedings are discontinued, unless exceptions apply.

§ 278 Abs. 1 StPO

Cited to establish the general rule that costs are borne by the private plaintiff if the facts warrant it, as an alternative to the accused bearing them.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Kriminal- und Anklagekommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 22.09.2004

Fallnummer: · KA 04 83

LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 69

Leitsatz: · § 277 Abs. 1 StPO. Die blosse Feststellung, dass das Verhalten der angeschuldigten Person erheblich von jenem eines Durchschnittsmenschen abweiche, ohne die angeblich verletzte Norm zu bezeichnen, genügt nicht, um ihr (amtliche) Verfahrenskosten zu überbinden.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.