Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
JK 10 12 • KG LU JK 10 12 Generato dall'IA

Income Surplus Barring Free Legal Aid in Divorce Appeal

Numero d'incarto JK 10 12
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A litigant appealing a lower court's denial of free legal aid for divorce proceedings, despite claiming need, was found to have a calculable monthly surplus of income over expenses, which the appellate court reasoned must be utilized for litigation costs because the litigant was not currently paying court-ordered spousal support obligations, adhering to the principle that actual income and expenditures determine eligibility and that any such surplus, absent existing support payments to the spouse, must be applied to the procedural expenses.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

§ 130 Abs. 1 ZPO. Bezahlt ein UR-Gesuchsteller keine Unterhaltsbeiträge an seine Ehefrau, so ist der daraus resultierende Überschuss für die Prozessführung zu verwenden. | Zivilprozessrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
spese di gratuito patrocinio procedura di divorzio reddito eccedente coniuge deficit dell'unione coniugale accertamento del reddito

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 130 Abs. 1 ZPO

This provision was cited in the decision itself, stating that any surplus income of an applicant not paying spousal support must be used for legal proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Justizkommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 20.04.2010

Fallnummer: · JK 10 12

LGVE: · 2010 I Nr. 28

Leitsatz: · § 130 Abs. 1 ZPO. Bezahlt ein UR-Gesuchsteller keine Unterhaltsbeiträge an seine Ehefrau, so ist der daraus resultierende Überschuss für die Prozessführung zu verwenden.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.