Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
30 05 12 • KG LU 30 05 12 Generato dall'IA

Psychiatric Commitment Appeal: Cost Award Based on Lack of Notice of Decision

Numero d'incarto 30 05 12
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Lucerna (CH-LU)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Spese processuali a carico dell'autorità / Stato

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court reviewed an appeal concerning the imposition of legal costs following a judicial decision to uphold a precautionary psychiatric commitment order, where the appellant consistently claimed not to have received the written commitment order, its reasoning, or the required instructions on the right to appeal. The court reasoned that because the administrative authority failed to prove delivery of the written decision with a reasoned justification and appeal instructions, as required by law and constitutional right to be heard, the procedural right of the affected person was violated, mandating that the state compensate the appellant for their attorney's fees for the lower court proceedings, despite the substantive merits of the commitment remaining unchallenged.

Regesto Legislator

Ufficiale

§§ 29, 110 Abs. 1 lit. c und e sowie 201 Abs. 2 VRG; Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV. Kann die Behörde nicht nachweisen, dass sie dem Betroffenen die schriftliche Einweisungsverfügung mit Begründung und Rechtsmittelbelehrung zugestellt hat, ist das rechtliche Gehör verletzt. | Verwaltungsverfahrensrecht

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
spese di procedura sindacato giurisdizionale diritto di rimanere decisione motivata motivazione nel merito diritto di essere sentito

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 201 Abs. 2 VRG

Applied to award the complainant party compensation for legal costs due to a serious procedural error.

§ 29 VRG

Cited in the context of the burden of proof for decision delivery, which relates to the procedural flaw leading to costs being awarded.

§ 110 Abs. 1 lit. c und e VRG

Cited to establish the right to a reasoned decision with instructions on appeal, forming the basis of the procedural violation.

Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV

Cited as the constitutional basis for the requirement of reasoned decisions, which was violated.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Verwaltungsverfahrensrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 12.08.2005

Fallnummer: · 30 05 12

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 40

Leitsatz: · §§ 29, 110 Abs. 1 lit. c und e sowie 201 Abs. 2 VRG; Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV. Kann die Behörde nicht nachweisen, dass sie dem Betroffenen die schriftliche Einweisungsverfügung mit Begründung und Rechtsmittelbelehrung zugestellt hat, ist das rechtliche Gehör verletzt.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.